Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    LessWrong’s descent into right-wing tradwife territory continues

    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tdQuoXsbW6LnxYqHx/annapurna-s-shortform?commentId=ueRbTvnB2DJ5fJcdH

    Annapurna (member for 5 years, 946 karma):

    Why is there so little discussion about the loss of status of stay at home parenting?

    First comment is from user Shankar Sivarajan, member for 6 years, 1227 karma

    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tdQuoXsbW6LnxYqHx/annapurna-s-shortform?commentId=opzGgbqGxHrr8gvxT

    Well, you could make it so the only plausible path to career advancement for women beyond, say, receptionist, is the provision of sexual favors. I expect that will lower the status of women in high-level positions sufficiently to elevate stay-at-home motherhood.

    […]

    EDIT: From the downvotes, I gather people want magical thinking instead of actual implementable solutions.

    Granted, this got a strong disagree from the others and a tut-tut from Habryka, but it’s still there as of now and not yeeted into the sun. And rats wonder why people don’t want to date them.

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      Dorkus malorkus alert:

      When my grandmother quit being a nurse to become a stay at home mother, it was seen like a great thing. She gained status over her sisters, who stayed single and in their careers.

      Fitting into your societal pigeonhole is not the same as gaining status, ya doofus.

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      Another comment that has been getting downvotes and tut-tuts begins,

      The only thing that will raise fertility rates is to make it more affordable to have a child.

      (Robot Santa voice) Wanting all women to be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen? Evil! Not providing footnotes in your reply to a blog post? EXACTLY AS EVIL

      • gerikson@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 days ago

        LOL the mod gets snippy here too

        This comment too is not fit for this site. What is going on with y’all? Why is fertility such a weirdly mindkilling issue?

        “Why are there so many Nazis in my Nazi bar???”