adr1an
- 38 Posts
- 390 Comments
adr1an@programming.devMto
Linux@programming.dev•Systemd preparing to comply with age verification laws
17·2 months agoPlease keep the discussion polite, and don’t get too much carried away into trying to convince others of your own ideas. Exchange is less than that. And sometimes, less is more. Thanks in advance.
adr1an@programming.devMto
Linux@programming.dev•Ubuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUD
12·2 months agoI believe the community had expressed a lot of valuable ideas here, so I will keep the post. But I am locking the thread because it’s just not information given in good faith. That’s not to say that the points are all wrong, these can be debated. And we did debate. But the infographic itself is border to being just propaganda against a distro that serves well to a lot of users (this is a fact! even if me or you think those users could be served better.)
adr1an@programming.devto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Ideon: I'm building a self-hosted project cockpit on an infinite canvas (v0.5 update)English
1·3 months agoAs OP said, stars correlated with their own posting on Lemmy. So your affirmation is not absolutely true. It’s all relative… same applies to posting on reddit vs. lemmy… There’s a dilemma between popularity vs. a smaller niche population with ethical concerns.
In a similar vein, PRs might be more in quantity but less in quality when comparing any foss project on github vs codeberg…
adr1an@programming.devto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Ideon: I'm building a self-hosted project cockpit on an infinite canvas (v0.5 update)English
2·3 months agoYes it is. You will only lose github issues. You need to set repo there as mirror without issues and that’s it, done
adr1an@programming.devto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•I Spent a Year Replacing My Subscriptions by Self Hosting. Here’s How.English
1·3 months agoWireguard allows you to tunnel properly. For example, if you have a low cost vps, self-host Pangolin and voilà. Tho idk about android apps, surely there’s some wireguard clients that work perfectly fine with Pangolin
This is a bit offtopic. I’d rather have more content on Linux in and on itself than these rants against a corporate OS. Thread locked.
adr1an@programming.devto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Introducing Hypermind: A fully decentralized, P2P, high-availability solution to a problem that doesn't exist.English
2·4 months agoI don’t like those projects either. Scuttlebut and cjdns looked more “profesional” to my ignorant eyes. I bring these up because I’d like to hear your comments. I will check 10fingers now…
adr1an@programming.devto
Today I Learned@lemmy.world•TIL Iran Has No Water Left, 28 Million People WITHOUT WaterEnglish
31·6 months agoAnd I wouldn’t say the use here is just a swearword. Saying Iran is under a fascist regime should unite us to identify a problem, the suffering of their population. Do not allow semantics to be one another reason why we are fighting among us, the people with radical decency.
adr1an@programming.devto
Today I Learned@lemmy.world•TIL Iran Has No Water Left, 28 Million People WITHOUT WaterEnglish
23·6 months agoSince when are we getting so heated debates about fascism? Trump has ICE, and no one discussed if he wasn’t facist before that. Learn to see the cues. Elimination of competing political rivals is just one aspect.
Plus, if we were to look for a definition, might as well take one that accounts for understanding that facist regimes are, beyond all, a process. See for example the text by George Orwell: ‘What is Fascism?’ (1944)
By ‘Fascism’ they mean, roughly speaking, something cruel, unscrupulous, arrogant, obscurantist, anti-liberal and anti-working-class. Except for the relatively small number of Fascist sympathizers, almost any English person would accept ‘bully’ as a synonym for ‘Fascist’. That is about as near to a definition as this much-abused word has come.
But Fascism is also a political and economic system. Why, then, cannot we have a clear and generally accepted definition of it? Alas! we shall not get one — not yet, anyway. To say why would take too long, but basically it is because it is impossible to define Fascism satisfactorily without making admissions which neither the Fascists themselves, nor the Conservatives, nor Socialists of any colour, are willing to make. All one can do for the moment is to use the word with a certain amount of circumspection and not, as is usually done, degrade it to the level of a swearword.
adr1an@programming.devto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•PSA syncthing-fork has changed ownersEnglish
1·6 months agoThanks. Sure it is. But I will call this a feature now ;)
adr1an@programming.devto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•PSA syncthing-fork has changed ownersEnglish
4·6 months agoFor some reason, my version of syncthing-fork is old and source is not even on f-droid anymore. Was there any other before catfriend1? Perhaps I downloaded APK from GitHub… Can’t recall.
adr1an@programming.devMto
Linux@programming.dev•Chat Control 2.0 has passed the first round of approval
9·6 months agoThis is kinda off-topic to this community. I will lock the conversation, feel free to crosspost (if not done already) to the proper space (I know, the audience is shared between both, but still…)
adr1an@programming.devto
Open Source@lemmy.ml•FFmpeg to Google: Fund Us or Stop Sending Bugs
6·6 months agoSome GPLv2 projects monetize by selling: support, extension via custom features, or simply the permission for a commercial use. This is possible, and it’s what I called “the legalese package”. Imagine ffmpeg being able to charge every year any amount they want to the biggest clients, like GAFAM. Yet you’re still able to use it non commercially… To be fair, there’re some middle uses, that get the disadvantage of having to break the license or ask for permission. For example, if you create anything with ffmpeg, then as an indie dev you’d need to launch your product breaking the license or paying them… But even so, situation is manageable (e.g. ffmpeg could spare you and/ or give a 1 year permission to small businesses)
adr1an@programming.devto
Open Source@lemmy.ml•FFmpeg to Google: Fund Us or Stop Sending Bugs
32·6 months ago“Allow me to interject and explain the four liberties…” (Or, goto fsfe.org/freesoftware )
If I understand correctly the biggest issue for FFMPEG and other projects is not only the Google and Microsoft that use them without giving back, but their chosen License. They gave permission to corporations to do this. One of the potential ways to fix this situation, is to change the license. For example from LGPL to AGPL. And then they can sell the legalese package of allowing them to break their license. The biggest difficulty is that, as a project, they’d need consent from every past and future contributors. So, yeah. I get it. This is a mess.
It would be way more easier if more corporations donated to open source projects… There’s too much labour that’s invisible
adr1an@programming.devMto
Linux@programming.dev•Debian's APT Will Soon Begin Requiring Rust: Debian Ports Need To Adapt Or Be Sunset
1·6 months agoIf your experience tells you the open source community is less vulnerable to backdoors or something, reconsider that.
I only said that I agreed with you in those words…
Do you think backdoors are the only threat? or the biggest?? in both cases, you’d be wrong. That’s the whole point in this exchange of opinions.
adr1an@programming.devMto
Linux@programming.dev•Debian's APT Will Soon Begin Requiring Rust: Debian Ports Need To Adapt Or Be Sunset
1·6 months agoI am not saying this as a moderator: you’re person of obnoxious answers. Probably far too intelligent to even consider that you’re actually interacting with other human beings that may not want to engage or sacrifice their time with your rants. But I don’t ban based on personality.
Anyway, I don’t have to answer any of your questions. Typing comes too fast on your keyboard. Try stepping away, read, click the links (like redishiel CVE), take a deep breath, live more calmly.
I will post a reply to you reply on Redishell. So that you can check again what happened there. You went too fast and hit your own wall.
adr1an@programming.devMto
Linux@programming.dev•Debian's APT Will Soon Begin Requiring Rust: Debian Ports Need To Adapt Or Be Sunset
1·6 months agoHere’s your reply to Redishell. You answered “To anyone confused: […]” and went on and on talking about backdoors.
adr1an@programming.devMto
Linux@programming.dev•Debian's APT Will Soon Begin Requiring Rust: Debian Ports Need To Adapt Or Be Sunset
1·6 months agothe only loss here is my time as a moderator :P
I am not banning anyone, you were quite civil in this “fight” 1
Do keep in mind that all this has a lot of “editor wars” vibes. But the conflict goes beyond Debian (e.g. including Rust in Linux kernel), and actual harmful discussions between Rust and C/C++ people is REAL, damaging our communities, and very much driven by generations/ network-effect. And this is just sad. It’s not a technical issue, and overcoming it seems nearly impossible at the moment.
–
1 I’d call it discussion, but it seems to me that ‘whoever loves Digit’ was ranting more on their own behalf… as per their own words:
Awareness should be raised for this stuff, because people are sadly not as concerned as they should be about the state of cybersecurity right now. It’s particularly an issue in Linux / FOSS circles where there seems to be more of a false sense of security these days.
I agree with these words, but not all you said (specifically, backdoors to me are a smaller concern in the software industry nowadays in comparison to the Redishell provided that you were unable to fully understand). Anyway, I don’t see reason to remove any of the most downvoted comments you have. But I will take the opportunity here to raise a warning to you. OR, let’s make it a personal advice: arguing on the internet is not worth the emotional toll. As with any advice, you can either take it or leave it. Good luck!




















Indeed, I am locking the thread for it’s offtopic. We had already a lot of discussion with systemd accomodating to this law. To OP: feel free to crosspost.