• Monument@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    I became disappointed when I zoomed in to realize she had a wallet chain and not a sproingy yellow coiled lanyard thing that was somehow attached to her phone. (Sorry, Amazon link: One of these)
    I don’t know why. I guess I just thought the idea was kind of cute and fun. This dad-fucking, bacon grease swilling, subway texter uses a cute little bouncy cord thing to keep her phone handy, amidst an otherwise austere getup - just a zany detail to contrast with the rest. Alas. Just a boring ass wallet chain.

  • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 months ago

    Cringe.

    She must have been fucking our dads every night for years.

    Edit: Lol at the downvotes, if you want to wear an edgy shirt in public you’re going to have to expect some edgy retorts and furthermore I think anything that attempts to normalise obesity is absolutely terrible. I know I have to accept that some people are fat, and good for her if she’s happy at that size, but I don’t have to accept edgy excuses for someone else’s poor choices.

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      1·
      3 months ago

      You didn’t get any replies yet you decided to edit your comment to argue with an imaginary opponent. Mate, take a breath.

      • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
        01·
        3 months ago

        37 downvotes, yet no one brave enough to put their neck on the line and offer a counterpoint. So yh, I made an assumption and yet still no one has made a counterpoint which means I’m probably right 🤷🏼‍♂️

        • cheddar@programming.dev
          1·
          3 months ago

          If you want to write edgy replies, you have to expect some downvotes. I think that attempts to normalize toxicity and trolling online are absolutely terrible. I know I have to accept that some people are provocateurs, but I don’t have to accept excuses for their poor behavior.

        • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
          1·
          3 months ago

          I’ll reply: no one is offering a retort because your comment is weird, pointless, and not worth the time or effort to give a genuine response to. Your edit makes it even more obvious that you just wanted to stir shit and get in bad faith arguments over a silly picture

        • Lupus@feddit.org
          1·
          3 months ago

          Lol no one cares enough to reply to you mate. The reaction is “what a dork” downvote and forget.

  • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 months ago

    If you reversed the gender on this you’d the comment section would be a combination of roasting the hypothetical dude and complaining how trashy the shirt is.

    I don’t even think the double standard is related to sexism. I think you’re all horny degenerates who are emotionally stunted to the point where any woman implying anything sexual breaks your mind.

    • filtoid@lemmy.ml
      1·
      3 months ago

      I actually disagree with that, if I saw a larger gentleman wearing this I’d feel proud of him for owning his thing with self-depracating humour, and think it was funny, the same as I do here.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      0·
      3 months ago

      I thought the same thing and I’m still not convinced that’s not what’s going on. I remember in the '90s so many people were putting chains to their wallets, you know wear your money is… Well your cell phone is probably attached to one of your accounts, so it’s money. This weirdly makes sense to me.

      • shastaxc@lemm.ee
        1·
        3 months ago

        I think it makes perfect sense, and a cool retro throwback. Fashion is cyclical after all! But I think the other poster was correct and she just has it fed through 2 belt loops.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          3 months ago

          Fashion is cyclical after all!

          I just heard today that you’re considered old if you wear ankle socks now. It was the opposite when I was younger, not wearing ankle socks made you look old and out of fashion.