• Kache@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t understand, if you’ve got easy to delete copy-pasted code, then delete it. It’ll be a nice and cathartic exercise.

    But sounds like what you’re really talking about is code that isn’t easy to delete.

    • Lysergid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t understand too. Are you suggesting me to drop bunch of features in the product?

      • samus7070@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I think the responder means that duplicate code is usually easy to refactor into single methods. Typically I see copy pasted code that is changed just a little bit. However much of a duplicated function can be broken into smaller functions and the redundant code removed in favor of calling into the functions. Often what is left then becomes easier to reason about and refactor accordingly. I love the PRs that I make which delete more code than I add but still manage to add functionality. It doesn’t happen often but it’s fun when it does.

        • Lysergid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Right, but my initial comment was about article’s statement being wrong. Refactoring in the way you described will make code harder to delete which is bad according to the article.