Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week’s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Update: The QRTs are mainly sneering, but this one’s particularly good

    EDIT: Against my better judgment, I’m letting another sidenote come out:

    If you wanna encourage people to drop the master/slave naming scheme, this guy probably gave you a good bit of ammo. Changing a random naming scheme is a pretty low-priority task under most circumstances, but it gets a lot more tempting when it lets you distance yourself from people like this

    • bitofhope@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I found the git master branch naming controversy a bit misguided, since to my mind the analogy was more “master copy” or “master recording” than “master of a slave”. This isn’t IDE. Who names their VCS branch “slave”?

      Well, I guess that guy does.

      • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        I found the git master branch naming controversy a bit misguided, since to my mind the analogy was more “master copy” or “master recording” than “master of a slave”. This isn’t IDE. Who names their VCS branch “slave”?

        In a better world, this would’ve probably been a solid argument for letting the master/slave naming convention stick around. We don’t live in a better world.

    • o7___o7@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      This guy would be a lot happier if someone had given him a pound of weed when he was 12 then introduced him to college football fandom.