Who can suggest an ethical SMTP provider for low volume transactional mail? I’m willing to pay up to 2€/month for a few hundred mails per month.

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I use Brevo as well. Free tier: 300 emails per day.

      Very happy with them.

      • tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        EU servers might be worth something to some people, depending on where they are in the world. And while 190% is indeed “way more expensive”, relatively speaking, it’s still “well under” your goal of EUR 2 per month.

        • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          That’s actually a good point. Will need to think about server location and GDPR compliance.

      • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, sorry it’s not a precise term. I mean a non asshole company.

    • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Mostly that they respect the privacy of my users and that they don’t have shady business practices that want to push you towards an over-expensive paid tier.

  • FlightyPenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know what you mean by “ethical”, but I use Sendgrid. They have a free tier that can send up to 100 emails a day.

    • wraith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ll second PurelyMail. Easy to set up and they have explainers for all the various settings. I pay $10 a year for “unlimited” domains and mailboxes (some caveats but for minimal mail we won’t hit any limits).

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You could use some containerized mail server like Mailcow. They’re pretty alright to set up and should work fine for low volume. At least in my experience. Unless you don’t want to deal with mail yourself, then you should maybe consider a paid service. But I don’t have any experience with those.

    • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I specifically want to not deal with deliverability beyond the content and volume of my mails.

    • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Amazing! Now this is something I haven’t heard of. I think we might have a winner here! Best thing, I could use it for transactional mail on all my websites for 10€/yr. Including as many inboxes as needed. Nice!

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agreed, and well-articulated. I think you (OP) need to ask yourself whether you’re willing to pay the appropriate market rate for the service or not. I don’t know what that is, but I expect it’s higher than you’ve expressed.

      • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Have a look at purelymail mentioned by others. It’s almost exactly what I’m looking for.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Also, we’re in beta

          That means there might be a few hiccups along the way. If you run across any problems you can always let us know, and we’ll do our best to fix them.

          I would have thought this is a disqualifier in terms of quality of the service, but if that’s acceptable to you then I’m glad you got something that works.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Low volume” vs. “A few hundred mails per month”

    OK, what of the above?

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      A few hundred a month is just a few per day. That is pretty low volume by most standards.

      I would say in general if the SMTP server could be replaced by a single human writing and mailing snail-mail letters by hand it qualifies as low volume.

    • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is something you used to be able to do for free, no problem. It’s only a few of the big mail accepting companies being extra shitty about accepting mail making this tough. Looking at you Microsoft. So a few hundred mails per month is ridiculous both on storage, bandwidth and CPU consumption.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I know. I was there, before Sanford Wallace invented the email spam and forced any sane SMTP server into password protections and whitelists.