Mozilla once again notices that, in spite of the lavish salaries they heap upon their techbro executives, Firefox’s userbase continues to dwindle. Could this be because they don’t operate a monolithic surveillance advertising racket? Or maybe it’s because the corners in the UI aren’t round enough.

https://www.firefox.com/en-US/whatsnew/157/

Choice quote from that interview, which was important enough to get a big box in the release notes too:

We are bringing back compact mode as well

We removed it for absolutely no goddamn fucking reason, despite numerous objections, and now we’re bringing it back! This is called ‘listening’, you see. We are very dependable can definitely be relied upon to provide a stable browser that you won’t have to worry about.

Somehow those executives just can’t work out that unless you can advertise Firefox in all of the search engines and youtubes and gmails and docs and drives and whatever the fuck and preinstall it on all the phones, the Chrome users will not come. “Ooh shiny” is the least of anyone’s concerns.

  • paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    And part of this is made possible by AI tools, to be honest with you. We are able to do a lot more.

    People want to feel like they’re in a modern browser—things that match the design language of the operating system. So that’s part of it. We are bringing back compact mode as well…

    firefox isnt competitive enough. @grok bring back compact mode. checkmate, chromium

  • rhel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    To disable the new design, simply uncheck the “Enable the Nova redesign” option (Settings > Appearance > Browser theme).

    Alternatively, set browser.nova.enabled to false in about:config.

  • Sina@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    What Firefox needs is to fire everyone responsible for the UX, if they have such people on their payroll & put all their ehm “limited” resources on improving performance & some effort is also needed to become more Chromium compatible, perhaps even on a site by site basis. Alas as long as Google is the main revenue source for the project, all this is a pipe dream.

    Firefox never had other issues. Poor performance -especially JS- compared to Chromium & some websites just don’t work anymore.

  • self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    the worst part of using Firefox is mozilla

    the second worst part is mozilla fans

    • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is why I use Zen. I don’t even care about most of the extra features, I just like not having to disable the sponsored shortcuts and stupid pocket articles on my new tab page every time I install the browser

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      it never went away, it just had to be ‘enabled’ in about:config (search: compact). note this still has to be done if you disable ‘nova’ redesign.

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I got the update today and I’m so tired boss. We had almost settled on something visually calm and organized, and leeeettzzzgooooo back to floaty rounded shit with no choice left to the user !

    Blender does interface right, please for the love of Cthulhu take some inspiration: it’s got a “roundedness” property for every UI widget that goes from perfectly square to perfectly round, a “widget emboss” property that can be tuned to your liking or disabled entirely, a “widget underline” property, it lets you disable button decorations as well so your toolbars are only floating icons, etc. Every combination is possible and it’s very easy to tune. Please do something like that and never touch it again.

  • Undaunted@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I really can’t wait for Servo to get into a usable state and have alternative browsers being build on top of that.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      How do I start using this, is it something an end user can support through adoption?

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        no, it’s very much not up to web standards yet. it has a super fast html renderer and css engine that support something like 70% of properties, a very barebones js runtime that has basically no browser apis, and a frontend that (i think) only takes urls via command-line.

        • Jayjader@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Honestly that description kinda makes me want to target servo for all of my hobby browser-backed UIs. Html5 with forms can do a surprising amount (albeit not always as effortlessly as just including a JavaScript library) - though I expect something like IndexedDB isn’t at all available?

          EDIT: well, the servo repo has a bunch of code in a storage/engines/indexeddb folder, but the repo aussi has about 30 open issues relating to “IndexedDB” in one way or another.

          • black0ut@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I’m currently targetting CSS 2.0 for one of my projects. I’m trying to make it work right on a 3DS, Netscape Navigator, IE and, of course, Servo, without serving custom files to each other.

            It’s been incredibly annoying, but also fun to learn about standards from 1998, and how browsers handled them.

            It’s also disheartening to learn that the modern web is, at its core, designed not to run on basically anything older than 2016.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            i don’t know if they’re going in version order with implementations either so that’s an extra complication

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The less APIs the better, some of the information my phone is giving out currently to evwry site I visit is ridiculous

      • jaschop@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You can download an executable and surf websites with it, which will frequently break I guess.

        Not sure how much help one can offer atm except donating or contributing directly.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Duh. Obviously the logo is what’s wrong, better redesign that too.

    No, wait, it needs AI!

    No, wait, it needs to tell me about some VPN.


    Support the specifications, be secure. Perhaps try that.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I mean, can’t several things be worked on at the same time?

        When funds are tight? No, they can’t. There are finite engineering resources. The more new features you add, the more bugs are introduced, and the less resources there are to fix any of them (old or new).

      • cristian64@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Yes, but you need to be careful not to give the impression that all you are doing is work on round borders again, and not on supporting more web features.

          • cristian64@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Well, to me this is yet another redesign; still no support for WebUSB. I worry and rant because I care, as I don’t ever want to use a Chromium-based browser. So, Firefox should really put focus (as well as focus in blog announcements) on the true important aspects of the web.

            • klankin@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I think thats an intentional choice, because the security and privacy over the current implementation (which is designed around chrome fingerprinting as always)

              • flowerysong@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I’m sure they don’t make silly decisions for no reason.

                Ah, I see you’ve never used Firefox or paid attention to any of the decisions that Mozilla’s leadership makes.

              • rhamph@awful.systemsOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Moaning about missing features from a nonprofit, and volunteer project doesn’t look good.

                Mozilla Corporation, whose CEO was paid six million dollars last year, and 6.9 million in 2022, is a nonprofit volunteer project?

                • Soyweiser@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Of course the CEO gets paid that, if they don’t do that they run the risk of running a profit, gotta get rid of the money somehow. /s

  • WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Opera 12 started to do this. China owns it now and it is based on Chromium. A couple of Open Source browsers did it for the same reason later and lost users like their was orbital bombardment hitting their project. Grab a brain… it is not the design language that makes Chrome so successful and if you look and act like them, well users are just going to use them.

    • ebu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      i, too, dislike it when things are owned by the evil scary China instead of good and righteous Norway

    • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Because edge is actually based on chromium?

      Basically all of it is chromium. There is a ton of stuff that is not just the rendering extension that is included like extensions, pwa support, or hardware interface protocols (like webusb) that are from chromium, that wouldn’t work if edge was just using blink. Chromium isn’t just the rendering engine, it’s this whole platform.

      They do mention blink in the article, so they do seem to be aware of this distrinction.

      • Victor@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Well, egg on my face, Edge is a bigger rip-off than I thought. Thanks for the enlightenment.

      • sam@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        i don’t see pwa or webusb/webhid/webserial talked about enough. There’s so much cool stuff that can be done with it. it lets kids to be able to program an ESP32 for learning electronics. it lets me re-flash my keyboard without needing to download any additional software. comma.ai uses it for factory resetting their devices.

        i used to use pwa for homeassistant and klipper/fluidd 3d printer control, and while Zen essentials kinda fills that use case, a standalone window would be nice. I remember seeing talks about making progress towards supporting pwa, but i guess nobody else cares. Just like their conversation on webserial. Darn shame that we get integrated ai instead

        • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          PWA’s in firefox are interesting. They are actually really well supported, just not visually/in the UX.

          For example, if you visit https://wavemakercards.com/ or https://www.photopea.com/ once, they will then work offline. This is a big oart of the PWA featureset.

          It’s because of this that there are unofficial extensions that let you “install” PWA’s like you can om chromium.

          My personal theory, is that firefox is in the middle of very long UI rewrite/refactor, and only when it’s completed or nears completion, will we see features like vertical tabs, tab groups, or these other UI features people have been asking for for a while but have never gotten added.

          • sam@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I know a lotta apps do indeed make use of pwa stuff like local session storage. But for some strange reason, I got used to being able to open web apps in their own window from a desktop shortcut. I kinda miss being able to do that on Zen.

            Also I thought Firefox got vertical tabs recently? I know Zen has tab groups and is centered around having vertical tabs, like Arc. Amazing project with single dev, highly recommend checking out if you’ve never heard of it

          • mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Imo, they should pull the Zen browser features. It’ll really help it differentiate from Chrome while increasing usability.

    • rhamph@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Blink, the engine developed by the Chromium project? What a fascinating and important distinction.