Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

    • JFranek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Slack CEO responded there that it was all a “billing mistake” and that they’ll do better in the future and people are having none of it.

      A rare orange site W, surprisingly heartwarming.

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I really don’t buy the “billing mistake” line - they’ve been doing the same thing to many other community-org slacks. I’ve seen with my own eyes the mail that was sent to the ZA tech slack

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m a bit split on this one

      on the one hand, the post as first posted had a lot of “victimised” language (“omg slack is extorting us”) and frankly that felt like bait - esp as many, many volunteer-type orgs that have had similar slack setups have been taking a hammer for months now (as I posted before, a local ZA tech setup was one, and more recently that big k8s one too). there’s enough precedent here that expecting slack to have behaved otherwise (even “honourably”) seems to me to have been almost foolish

      on the other, slack 100% only took action once this did hit hype and enough eyeballs, and only reacted since it was an embarrassment

      but…yeah. slack hasn’t been a good option for public use for literally years now :|

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It sucks how much time in tech is spend on 'sorry this tool we recommend before suddenly is no longer free, or removed some options (either totally or into the paywall part) so now we will have to look for something else.

        Seen it happen to simple csv editors for example.