

Other countries don’t enshrine freedom of speech the way the US does. In many countries certain types of political speech are outlawed.
Other countries don’t enshrine freedom of speech the way the US does. In many countries certain types of political speech are outlawed.
Peanut butter powder?
Probably, but if you’re interpreting user inputs as raw code, you’ve got much much worse problems going on, lol.
I loved FFSend. When it died, I ended up standing up a GOKAPI server, as it was the closest alternative I could find at the time: https://github.com/Forceu/Gokapi
Definitely not as nice as FFSend though. I may have to give that fork a try instead.
Here’s the note taking and editors page of awesome-selfhosted. Looks like there are a few contenders in there. DailyTxT looks decent for your use case.
https://awesome-selfhosted.net/tags/note-taking--editors.html
I was gonna post this if you didn’t, lol.
Yeah, it can for sure. Definitely worth mentioning. Gotta watch what interface is set as the default router, or you’re bound to have a bad time. That said, the same is true with his originally proposed solution of pushing a trunk port to the VM, so it’s not any worse in that regard.
But yeah, full agreement on the correct solution. Keep it simple.
I wouldn’t let every VM have an interface into your management network, regardless of how you implement this. Your management network should be segregated with the ability to route to all the other VLANs with an appropriate firewall setup that only allows “related/established” connections back into it.
As for your services, having them on separate VLANs is fine, but it seems like you would benefit from having a reverse proxy to forward things to the appropriate VLAN, to reduce your management overhead.
But in general, having multiple interfaces per VM is fine. There shouldn’t be any performance hit or anything. But remember that if you have a compromised VM, it’ll be on any networks you give it an interface in, so minimizing that is key for security purposes. Ideally it would live in a VLAN that only has Internet access and/or direct access to your reverse proxy.
Ah, gotcha. Thanks! :)
Maybe it’s cause I’m on mobile, but I just see the intro paragraph, unless I’m missing something on how to see a full article?
I’d rule out k8s if you’re looking for simple administration.
Not to state the obvious one, but there’s always the Raspberry Pi.
The supply has gotten better on those, so you can probably pick one up in your price range, and the power draw is super minimal.
Codewars. It has Postgres as one of the languages.
Fair.
In addition to the other suggestions then, you could always just use VLC and the VLC Remote app that lets you control it from your phone.
Seems the easiest solution. No extra services to set up or anything. Literally just a video player with an app to control it from your phone.
I think there’s some confusion here over your proposed set up.
What device do you imagine having plugged into the HDMI of your TV? Is it your laptop or something else?
Are you intending on watching the videos through the web front end you’re imagining, or just using the web front end as a “remote control” as it were?
I don’t think most of the responders have a clear vision of what you’re going for.
Was intrigued by “no other symbols” than open and close bracket. Was curious how that would work while still being intuitive, so I looked at the examples. I’m now confused what you could have meant by that.
Just glancing through the example code I saw +,-,>,<,=, and ;. Like, at that point you’ve pretty much covered all the standard symbols. What “no other symbols” are there? Curly braces and pound signs?
And I’m not sure how beginner friendly this actually is, looking over the examples. Like, I feel like python is currently the “low bar beginner language” that you’re competing in that space with, and I don’t see what this is offering over that in terms of easiness.
Sure, python has more “functions you need to learn” I suppose, but if the answer to that is, “you don’t have to learn them in kcats because they don’t exist and you have to implement them yourself,” it seems like a detriment rather than a boon…
While I’m not exactly sympathetic to the “plight of the white man,” it is a little weird (if true) that the USDA can have a “white men only fee” for some programs.
My understanding was that most DEI initiatives were built around breaking up old-boys-clubs by requiring preference for minority businesses when all other factors are considered equal. The above doesn’t really feel like that.