Contact me on matrix chat: @nikaaa:tchncs.de
- 19 Posts
- 308 Comments
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Would an ActivityPub enabled fediverse alternative of Discord be possible?English
1·1 day agoyeah content discovery sucks unfortunately :(
I do think there maybe should be better lists and indexes of stuff that shows you related content on the Fediverse.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•How to (safely) create a Lemmy instance?English
2·1 day agothat’s a good idea as well! might consider that.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•How to (safely) create a Lemmy instance?English
3·1 day agoI want to set up a Lemmy server too (currently still deciding between Lemmy and PieFed) to host some basic content that we create at a university group with the public. It’s more like a blog than anything else, at least as envisioned. I’d also like to add some cool features to it like auto-posting (i.e. we have a bot that automatically uploads certain posts).
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Would an ActivityPub enabled fediverse alternative of Discord be possible?English
2·1 day agowhich tbh is a bad idea from the start
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Would an ActivityPub enabled fediverse alternative of Discord be possible?English
4·1 day agoI think the reason why Matrix doesn’t use AP is mostly to draw a clear line between public and private activity. Because if you use one protocol for both, the temptation is high to mix them and that leads to unclean implementations which leak messages. I think it should stay divided.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Would an ActivityPub enabled fediverse alternative of Discord be possible?English
6·1 day agomatrix can absolutely be a social experience. check out the 196 blahaj chat: https://matrix.to/#/#196-Blahaj:chat.blahaj.zone
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Would an ActivityPub enabled fediverse alternative of Discord be possible?English
8·1 day agoIf i understand correctly, Discord is a chat application for private and group chats. There is Matrix chat that works reasonably well as a replacement.
It’s decentralized, open source software, and i’ve used and tested it for at least a year now. It works well enough. It does not use the ActivityPub protocol though.
Mind that Matrix chat tends to private/group chats, which means they’re not typically visible to everyone else. Which means it would make little sense to try to embed them into the rest of the fediverse, which is openly accessible.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Lemmy@lemmy.ml•[Help Design Lemmy] How to describe Lemmy in a single Sentence?English
1·2 days ago“Discuss interesting topics and join communities on the Fediverse.”
IMO it’s better than “link aggregator” because we don’t only share links here, but also images and text.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Lemmy@lemmy.ml•[Help Design Lemmy] Joinlemmy website and New User OnboardingEnglish
1·3 days agoAlso it would be neat if instance admins could automatically set a certain set of “subscribed instances/communities” and “blocked instances/communities” for each new user that signs up on their instance. That would make it easier for instances to give themselves a certain “flavor” so users have an easier time finding interesting stuff.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Lemmy@lemmy.ml•[Help Design Lemmy] Joinlemmy website and New User OnboardingEnglish
1·3 days agoHow about the instance selection wizard (click “join a server” on the homepage), which lets you select topics and languages to select instances. Do the current options make sense?
I do think the “topic”/“language” selection screens make sense overall.
Also what i noticed is that on http://join-lemmy.org/ when you select certain topics (like “Art/literature” and “german speaking”), then the resulting instance list is empty. It might be wise to show at least one instance for every search query, even if it’s not 100% fit. For example, at least display one generic-topic instance for your language or one english-language instance for your topic.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Lemmy@lemmy.ml•[Help Design Lemmy] Joinlemmy website and New User OnboardingEnglish
1·3 days agoOne user told me they got to https://join-lemmy.org/docs/users/01-getting-started.html when they tried to sign up instead of to https://join-lemmy.org/ so maybe it would be good to have an easily-visible link there that brings you to the main landing page?
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Do we need more users ?English
1·4 days agobecause the alternative is to lose more than we gain each year because the option to “stay exactly the same” is statistically unlikely as it has a probability of around 0%.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Do we need more users ?English
1·4 days agobetter discovery tools
i think communities should have links to “related communities” in their sidebar sothat people can find similar communities more easily.
There could even be a “recommended” posts listing, besides the “subscribed”/“local”/“all” as it is today. it would show you posts from linked communities from communities that you already subscribed to too.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Do we need more users ?English
1·4 days agoi think if you copy posts/images manually it’s better because it shows that there’s a human actually wanting that community active, so other people can see that and engage as well. if a bot does it, it’s just a “flood” for no reason.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Do we need more users ?English
1·4 days agothe question is whether the upvotes of that post makes over half of the total upvotes on all posts on that instance, and that i seriously doubt
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Do we need more users ?English
2·4 days agoIMHO the internet isn’t for everyone. that might make me sound like an elitarian asshole but i think the internet’s only for people who enjoy going through information and are able to think without being swayed by group-think (tribalism) because otherwise it simply ends up in a bubble of rage bait and propaganda.
Essentially i think that maybe the internet of the future will be much smaller overall (think like 3% of its current user count) but it will probably be better that way.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Do we need more users ?English
1·4 days agoEfi System Partition 32 bit?
i remember writing code for the ESP boot system
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Do we need more users ?English
1·4 days agopiefed is great! :D
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Do we need more users ?English
1·4 days agoThere’s too many armchair activists here who won’t let you enjoy a single moment without reminding you that something bad is happening somewhere in the world and that you have some kind of moral obligation to be angry all the time about it. And if you’re not angry all the time then you’re somehow part of the problem.
That’s exactly what i’m complaining about as well. Being angry doesn’t even help. Having a clear head helps, but being angry IMO stands against that.







that’s great :D