There’s no reason to insult someone with a different viewpoint.
There’s no reason to insult someone with a different viewpoint.
You don’t quite understand. One of the major drawbacks of UUIDs over monotonically increasing id’s is the lack of ability to sort them. Not just for manual querying, but for index operations, caching, data locality etc.
It’s very handy and is a big part of the reason why Twitter developed Snowflake IDs, which are basically like UUIDs v6 and v7.
The UUIDs specs are quite easy to understand and definitely not “enterprisey”.
They chose “version” because they are just that, versions. Improvements over the original design that benefit from new insights and technological improvements. We’re lucky they had the foresight to include a version number in the spec.
A lot of people in this thread who don’t fully understand how UUIDs work…
I wonder what they consider deprecated.
Depends on why you want to hide your server ip, what’s your use case? Is it to protect against DDOS?
Cloudflare is evil, but is there any other party you would trust to share everything with?
Don’t worry, it’s fine, there’s nothing inherently wrong with running stateful workload in a container.
You should really back that up with arguments as I don’t think a lot of people would agree with you.
Well, you’ve pointed out one of the issues. Was it really worth dedicating an engineer’s limited time to?
Meh, most upscaling is pretty bad and doesn’t really add anything.
Of course it will, cloudflare is in front of it, they can definitely handje this traffic as long as itsfoss bothers to set correct caching headers for cloudflare to use. That’s the entire point of cloudflare…
Yes, but this way demand on instances scales with user count and aliows smaller instances to exist. Otherwise an errant toot on a small instance that suddenly gets popular will instantly drag that smaller instance down.
It’s not really Firefox’s task or problem to convert files from one format to the other, why would it be?
Either you misunderstand or the person you are responding to is. If you retroactively add a license to the current state of the code (for example by committing a new LICENSE file and adding the new license to the top of each file), or course that applies to the entire state of that code as of that commit. What is more difficult is that earlier commits won’t have that license explicitly unless you rewrite git history to make that happen (which is possible but tedious).
You can always relicense code you own the rights to. You can even dual license it, or continue to use it commercially in terms contradicting the license you open sourced it as, as long as you have the permission of every contributor.
The idea that a license added would only apply to code added after the license change is very funny.
… Cause they did so well finishing 7DTD?
That’s not what using proprietary code means in this case.
Besides, it’s possible they “legitimately” bought a copy of the game from a store that accidentally broke the embargo date. You can’t legally blame customers for that.
The author’s problems with achievements seem kind of arbitrary.
You’re not entirely clear on whether you want these services accessible from the internet or just internally. If the latter, change ACME settings to use DNS challenges instead of HTTP. If the former, recheck your dns records, maybe post them here (censored if you wish).
Yeah, good luck with that mate.
It’s alright. I use both their desktop backup service and B2 extensively. Their desktop client and web interface is very basic and a bit rough, you don’t buy their service for the well-developed UI. The service works as advertised though.