

I’ve been using linux for 25 years and I can count the number of times I used vi to actually edit something on one hand. They will not “have to use vi sooner or later.”
It’s OK not to like and not use nano. It’s also OK to like and use nano.


I’ve been using linux for 25 years and I can count the number of times I used vi to actually edit something on one hand. They will not “have to use vi sooner or later.”
It’s OK not to like and not use nano. It’s also OK to like and use nano.


After much searching, I found it: 3:42pm


I mean, the elephant in the room is the blatant licence violations orchestrated by LLM vendors. If your codebase is GPLed and serves to feed a LLM, it should extend to all the code produced by that LLM.
This seems so obvious to me, but this is the first time I’ve seen this argument in the wild.
But I guess the AI companies are basically arguing that copyright doesn’t apply to them at all, so it’s moot.


This article cites two X posts and makes vague assertions that “The claim caused a stir online, with some X users condemning Mamdani.” How much of a stir, how many users, and how many of them were criticizing Mamdani for the topic at hand is unclear.
I doubt many people were taken in (though I’m not surprised to see a west virginia lawmaker involved, state legislators are truly the dregs of our society), and I think Newsweek mostly made this up.


It took me way too long to figure out what was wrong with this screenshot


This is not a savvy or mature take, it’s a pedantic take. And I am no stranger to pedantry.
Nobody looks at this headline and thinks the Trump admin is directly putting pollutants in the air.


Maybe I should just be less cynical, but this headline doesn’t make me think “this is satire.” It makes me think “yep, par for the course for republicans.” This is basically what they’ve been promising to do for decades. It’s one step away from a headline like “Republicans cut taxes for the wealthy.”


If I wanted to cancel Skyrim Grandma, I absolutely would say that out loud. Why in the world wouldn’t I?


This isn’t an ethics dilemma. The BDS movement is specifically calling for this boycott. I’m trying to stand in solidarity with them in my own small way.


Not casting aspersions or trying to cancel Skyrim Grandma, but the BDS movement is calling for a Microsoft (and by extension Bethesda) boycott. If you’re thinking about buying Oblivion Remastered, maybe don’t.


City leaders see Musk’s arrival in Memphis, Tennessee, as a coronation of its future economy
The word “economy” should be outlawed. I’m not sure there’s a word that’s more obfuscatory. “It’ll be good for ~the economy~, how could you be against it?” Motherfucker will it be good for me? For my family? For my community? Or just some rich assholes, a bunch of implants, and some real estate developers?


I am also not a man
You don’t gotta brag like that


How did the breaker not trip on that? It had one job


Not quite the same thing, but there’s a project that lets you use TPM to protect your host keys: https://github.com/Foxboron/ssh-tpm-agent
[edit: its primary function is to work with clients but buried in the readme it also explains how to use it for host keys]


A billionaire who is 61 is very likely to outlive 75, even if they’re fat.


You’ve got it backwards. Of the two, Windows is closer to the open source ethos. Apple is a total control freak. Obviously both are bad, though.


$375 million in today’s dollars would cover (adjusted for inflation) the marketing and development of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_video_games_to_develop


This is a reference to the milkshake duck tweet
That money comes out of the workers’ pockets, not the bosses’, so it doesn’t count. If it showed up on corporate budgets we’d have robust universal public transit in 30 minutes