Lols [they/them]

thats because steam awards are a complete joke, and entirely worthless as any measure of anyrhing but name recognisability

deleted by creator

their games have featured modding on both playstation and xbox in some capacity

but yes, its also nonsense

thats an extremely weird assumption to make as a lemmy user

spreading child pornography is in fact illegal in most of the world

from what ive seen, most of the issues with the engine folks have are in fact not issues with the engine

76 has actually made me pretty hopeful for the direction of bethesdas games- it includes a return to older style dialogue, introduced more skill checks and the like, featured a more cohesive world and generally seemed like it went back on the simplification a fair bit

starfield similarly seems to be more of a return to form for them, focusing more on character builds, an expansive trait system etc

it is also being worked on heavily by the lead quest designer for far harbor iirc, which is absolutely a good sign and is setting my hopes high for a deeper, more complex and more forked main questline than Bethesda usually goes for

no actually, since the conversation is explicitly about conspiracy to commit murder, arguing that any belief in enforcing participation in society constitutes that is explicitly saying that having laws automatically means killing people

you dont actually get to say ‘violence’ instead of ‘murder’ in a conversation about murder, and then pretend that you arent talking about murder

unless this is you admitting that communism is not actually a conspiracy to commit murder, in which case cool i agree!

being forced to participate in society is called following the laws of the country youre in

am i correctly understanding that you believe that enforcing the law automatically necessitates killing people? thats a pretty scary thing to believe, and in no way indicative of any particular ideology im sure

its also false, considering the continued existence of countries that have abolished the death penalty entirely

on a side note, can you explain why you moved the goal posts from ‘communists want to kill everyone’ to ‘well maybe not all of them but the ones that dont will never succeed’ to ‘well having laws means killing people’

If kumbaya is their plan, well, it isn’t going to succeed.

it sure seems like this is less about communists believing that violence is necessary, and more about you believing violence is necessary

actually, you distinctly said ‘every communist ive pushed far enough’, not ‘literally every communist’

heres some that dont agree

im not a communist and my explaining how violence is not a literal part of the definition for communism as it is with fascism is not proselytism

is that what you were doing? trying to get folks to join your cult of fascism?

because regardless or anecdotes, a communist ideal does not by definition necessitate a conspiracy to commit murder

even if not a single pacifist communist existed, and they do, itd still be totally possible to be both a pacifist and a communist

in contrast, violence is a fundamental part of what makes fascism fascism. a fascist party will never be pacifistic, because it would no longer be fascist

no, conspiracy to commit murder is not an inherent aspect of communist ideology in the same way that it is integral to fascism