That’s just naive in this context.

That is for you to decide

You should look inside yourself. At what level would your mind accept that you are at war? At what level would you accept that losses to your group are acceptable if lesser than your enemy? Keep in mind, if your answer is none, then the enemy wins via attrition.

I mean, who is it? Is it more my enemy or my friend?

Was likely 2 hours a day actual attended care, 1000 a day, 90k for 3 months, plus rent, food, materials, another 500 a day. That’s $135-155k even with conservative care in nicu. In a real nicu that would be 10x

Yes I always use less power and double or triple time no matter what. It helps a great deal.

I believe this does not apply to inverter microwaves, which actually do reduce the power.

Even in programming there are common feature frameworks. Having a system enumerate them based on a unified design vision from a single source architect rather than 50 different design ideas duct taped together could help a lot. I’ve seen some horrendous systems where you can tell a bunch of totally separate visions were frankenstein’d together, and the same happens in games where you can tell different groups wrote different sections.

It’s assuming the ai output isn’t very good. It assumes it can create a framework that necessarily still needs the actual writers, but now they don’t have to come up with 100% of the framework, but instead work on the actual content only. Storyboarding and frameworking is a hodgepodge of nonsense anyway with humans. The goal is to achieve non-linear scaling, not replace quality writers or have the final product Ai written.

I can see how it could be useful, or mandatory in future rpgs. It can generate a framework for a real writer, with extremely large amounts of logical branching, a billion times faster. Then you go over the top of it and use the framework as concepts to use or revise. This streamlines the process, unifies the creative vision, and allows for such a large game without procedural generation that would haven taken a team 10 years or not at all, done in 2.

Well first, it’s not necessarily the case it should be changed. No doubt we don’t fully understand, since we don’t fully understand how brains work. There may be very good reason we evolved to be the way we are, as it’s very possible that a single type of person cannot make the overall society successful as a whole. It also doesn’t mean our current systems work for everyone. It may mean that on average, we’d be best to have 2 different school structures to suit more types of people better. And no matter what, nothing can work for everyone. There will alway be outliers.

On average that’s the male experience. It’s genetics. Not for every individual as you clearly understand, but population statistics are pretty telling that there are huge differences between development and behaviors.

Testosterone

If you read this comic backwards… 1 jar vibes

I’ve become massively hardened to online discourse. I don’t need to block users when I can just ignore and not need to get the last word in. I know this is an incredibly rare ability, but I just wanted to entertain the idea here that there are alternatives.

The exception could be for discoverability. If garbage trolling spam overwhelms your front page, then it’ll be too time consuming to wade through it… So blocking entire communities makes a lot of sense in this case.

It requires drill down now and doesn’t list visits on the location itself which is a huge negative.

There isn’t, because you cannot prove a Lemmy user’s gender to enforce this. You can only moderate the content.

What he said was actually really funny if you’re literate.

There is no high ground

It would be, if it were comprehensive and applicable to match making, but I don’t think for most people that can be gleaned from fedi. Most people only lurk, few even directly follow communities, and the content people do interact with likely does not represent them well unless they put themselves out there like that.