Still not sure what you’re talking about… Is someone going to ask IA for payment related to the zendesk email?
Still not sure what you’re talking about… Is someone going to ask IA for payment related to the zendesk email?
Are you saying the person who sent the zendesk email is going to try to get IA to hire them for something? I’m not sure I follow…
No. And it’s hard to call the zendesk one a hack, even. They just used the same credentials that were leaked a couple weeks before.
Why do you think you’d hear about it?
I’m not a CPA, but I don’t think you can write off something that already made a profit. How would that even work, if companies were able to write off predicted ad revenue? They could make up any value and never have to pay any taxes at all.
I don’t think write-offs have anything to do with them removing these episodes.
I don’t think they can write it off either way, though. It only makes sense to write off shows that haven’t made money. It’s just “retiring” when you’re taking about something that’s already been released. There’s no ulterior profit motive, unlike when they write off unreleased movies and shows.
What does this have to do with write-offs? I don’t think they can write off episodes of South Park and the daily show that have already aired.
That depends on your OPSEC.
Isn’t the same true in the EU, then?
You also don’t need to show any ID for a business to meet “know-your-customer” regulations. Can you get a phone number without revealing your identity?
I believe the same is true in the US.
They’re targeting people selling stolen credit cards and drugs, who are advertising on telegram. Your friend (SWIM?) is fine.
If I misunderstood your post, it wasn’t intentional. Would you mind elaborating?
Either way there are a lot more contexts where one can use slut and not be shitty.
True, but I don’t think that’s the case here.
There’s no “punching down”, unlike with the antiquated ‘R’ word…
Women can’t be “punched down” on? News to me…
Sex shaming is fun?
No, yuzu’s main problem was being a for-profit company. That seemed to be central to Nintendo’s case against them. The company behind yuzu was making millions.
because of the way women are socialised those options seem unfavourable.
Do you think the inverse is also true? That men are socialized in a way that makes certain options seem unfavorable? For example, men are far less likely to pick methods that give other people a chance to intervene.
Thanks for clarifying.