• A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let’s create separate accounts for voting and for posting so to improve anonymity and freedom of expression.

    • Rimu@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I have been considering building it into PieFed, if votes became public. There would be a pool of 1000+ bot accounts which will vote on behalf of anyone who wants it. When a vote is cast one of the proxies would be randomly chosen to federate the vote instead.

        • Rimu@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t know it’s just a brain fart fantasy at the moment, haven’t seriously looked into it. But afaik there is no voting ring detection in Lemmy.

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            It would still make it near impossible to audit voting behavior from any instance if such practices came into effect. A single instance using that mechanism in a malicious way could seriously manipulate votes and it would be very hard to tell it was happening.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have this brilliant original idea, scroll down, and here you & @A_A@lemmy.world are…

        I was thinking an app like Voyager could help vote from a non-posting account. Maybe it’d need to route through a proxy to better obscure the connection between a posting and non-posting account. Seeing PieFed, suppose you could try that route instead but your idea might be more secure. Folks just have to trust you I suppose hehe. Maybe one could build greater trust with a Lemmy app (Voyager) than an instance (PieFed) if they proved the app kept stuff private locally, or am I wrong?

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        User’s votes anonymization through this system looks quite nice for me.

      • Iceblade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I like the idea - if the lemmy devs do implement public voting I’d definitely move over. Not only does it maintain the (current) state of voter visibility, but it also protects from the frequently cited admin and kbin/mbin exploits. Trusting one admin is far easier than trusting every admin.

        I was actually having similar thoughts after reading the post (forking lemmy) but idk if I have the time to run an instance.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Literally what Ill do if this happens. One account that gets no notifications posts no content and votes, then another account where I comment.