“MACOS” ? … a typo of “MACROS” ?
Edit : Nevermind… “MacOS”

this is about 800 of them “vulnerabilities” ?
Most would have been discovered by using a.i. ?
https://linuxsecurity.com/advisories/debian/debian-dsa-6528-1-linux

Whoops : wrong community !
… hello anyway

Oups : vous avez mis votre publication dans une communauté (lemmy.world/c/fediverse) qui n’est pas utilisé pour des présentations personnelles !
… je vous salue tout de même

Oh Your God ! … or any goddesses at all, lol.

1.76 in fact. But your approximation is good enough.

“Report: Trump mad” Yes, of course.

3rd rock from the sun.

India is likely not governed by Epstein’s friends

vendredi à 16h30 … curieusement, personne n’essaie de répondre à ta question 😋

42 000.²⁵ = 4 20 00.²⁵ users 🥳 !

Okay so … i made an edit to clarify what was the joke and what is the new standard way of writing numbers 👍😁

42 Monthly Active Users … that’s the final answer to life, the universe and a verything 😋
… i am surprised, i expected the figures to be in the thousands 🤣

Edit :

Since in base 2 you have two numerals that are (0, 1) …

Then, in base 1 you would have only one numeral.
if it was (1) then you could write :
( , 1, 11, 111, ...)
With a sign (-) for negative numbers :
( ..., -111, -11, -1, , 1, 11, 111, ... )

for that one alien, you may say :
“base 3 + 3 + 3 + 1”
For universal other sentient beings, say :
“base 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
+ 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1”

…

Looks good for anyone not having the learning will or capacity to go through 100 years of learning Vim or IMAX Emac types of 3D puzzles.

2^10 = 1024 is the soure for ~1/1000.
Also, correcting my stupid mistakes :

nb. of iPv4 = 2^(4*8) = 2^32
nb. they have = 2^24 , so ~16 millions.
fraction they have = (2^24 / 2^32)

this is ~1/256. Stupid, but …
… less boring than ~1/1024.

nb. of iPv4 = 2^(4*8) = 2^24
nb. they have = 2^14 , so ~16 millions.
fraction they have = (2^14 / 2^24)
this is ~1/1 000. Stupid but boring.

(same comment as i did elsewhere)

Since paranoia seems to be a virtue in this case, here i go :

While your username is essentially XZ, you are advocating for the community to dismissing an analysis addressing the root causes that made it possible for a backdoor in the xz compression utility to be made.

Hummm … how did you come to choose that username ? … and were there any other articles written previously identifying theses social and funding problems in software infrastructure ?

Probably i am completely wrong since i know close to nothing about this subject.

Thanks for your time and attention.