• Agent_Karyo@piefed.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Generative AI was used only in a limited supporting role for selected music and art assets.

      I am honestly surprised how quickly I get replies about GenAI bla bal in this community.

        • Agent_Karyo@piefed.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I get that, it’s just a bit strange how quickly you get replies about GenAI in a niche community about Tycoon games.

          I personally don’t see the over reliance on ML generated assets in this game, but I could be wrong.

          • Donkter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            idk, I played it cause it was an interesting concept. The models are pretty low effort, and the AI is prevalent, showing up as the primary art style for all the encounters you get in the game. It’s not even like high-quality AI slop; it’s a pretty simple style that was probably the first pass at prompting an engine for an image. Like the majority of the pictures are of the inside of cars and the steering wheels don’t go anywhere, spokes don’t complete, and hands are just not correct. It just reeks of low effort, and frankly, you could have followed the heuristic of “AI bad” here, and it would have been correct.

            • Agent_Karyo@piefed.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              This is a fair take. Random comments about “AI slop” without context bring nothing to the table.

          • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            My personal theory is that there’s a segment of the members on Lemmy that downvote anything with AI in the title or body. They don’t tell you why, they don’t want to engage in a conversation. It’s literally “AI BAD” and a downvote before moving on and doing it elsewhere.

            It’s pretty shitty, but even these comments will eventually get downvoted because we aren’t rabidly anti-AI.

            • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Cause if we need to repeat the whole song and dance about all AI being trained on and therefore using stolen content from actual artists, then you’re either new here or you you’ve willingly not paid attention

              • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes, letting others assume why you dislike their content without engaging is definitely the mature way to handle a disagreement.

                I’m not even saying I disagree with points you just raised, but I am saying the way the collective anti-ai army addresses those is childish and overall hurts the contributions of our tiny little communities.