• rozodru@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        worse than the first one. It’s fine. doesn’t really go anywhere and just kinda stops. It’s like the middle film of a trilogy if the end of the film doesn’t set up a big a big plot point going into a third. It does however potentially set up a “Super Smash Bros” type of thing as they’re clearly going the multiverse route and connecting all Nintendo first party properties into one universe. So wouldn’t surprise me in the third film if they have Kirby, Samus, etc.

        They’ve dealt with Bowser twice now, he’s not much of a threat so it’s likely they introduce Master Hand as pulling the strings over EVERYTHING in the Nintendoverse. Thus they go the Avengers route and do a Super Smash Bros film or series of films.

      • HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Worse. First one had some charm to it and told an alright story. This one was just a rapid series of references to as many Nintendo IPs as possible.

        Sure was pretty, though.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That was my concern having seen the trailers. It felt like they threw too many things in at once rather than slow rolling it to make three+ movies.

      • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Better than the first one.

        The first was a collection of scenes, the 2nd is a collection of better scenes.

        With a plot that was more compelling, to me at least.