In my 25 year career, I have never had to deal with such a garbage software vendor as this one. I don’t want to go on a rant since I have other things to do today and could go on for hours, but here are the highlights:

  • Application has like 30 modules. Each module has its own config file.
  • Config files are not centralized and reside in the directory with each module.
  • Vendor ships a zip file of slop code that requires manual assembly.
  • Vendor provides no substantial documentation. Every request for technical documentation is met with “Let’s setup a meeting to solve your immediate problem”.
  • Vendor ships dummy config files in every release necessitating manual backup/restore of the config for each of the 30 modules
  • Vendor changes config file format every third release. This requires re-configuring the entire application stack and all 30 modules.
  • Vendor puts the version info in the goddamned config file instead of building it into the compiled .NET application as a variable like a sane person would do.
  • Vendor sends an update every week and gets pissy when we don’t deploy it within 3 hours of their “we shat out an update” email.
  • Vendor has been asked repeatedly to address this. The only response we’ve gotten to these complaints is the sound of crickets chirping. 🦗

To answer any questions:

  1. Yes, I voiced my concerns long ago. They were ignored.
  2. Yes, they are the “lowest bidder” and it goddamned shows.
  3. Yes, they know I hate them.
  4. Yes, I tried writing scripts to manage the config files. They work once or twice until the vendor changes the config file format every 3rd-4th release.
  5. Yes, it is sunk cost fallacy all the way down, but I’ve been given my orders.
  • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Its okay to name and shame these products and vendors - they’re not listening to their customers so maybe the court of public opinion will work?

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Doing so would effectively doxx the org I work for and, by association, me, so no name and shaming this time. They’re not a big player you’d recognize, anyway, and mostly deal with specialty/niche software.

      • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sounds like healthcare to me!

        I noticed someone else mentioning their PACS client which was funny. I haven’t dealt with GEs one but care stream/Philips sucks