cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoFeel old yet?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square64linkfedilinkarrow-up1851arrow-down16
arrow-up1845arrow-down1imageFeel old yet?lemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square64linkfedilink
minus-squarenyan@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoNah, I’d end up explaining why floppy discs weren’t floppy, instead, and let the younger folks explain the CDs.
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoThey were floppy though? At least 8 inch, and 5.25 inch. 3.5 only on the inside (unless enough force is applied xD).
minus-squarenyan@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoThe larger ones were flexible, not floppy—they could be bent without cracking the casing, but wouldn’t just bend under their own weight.
minus-squareleftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIf you held them by a side and shaked them, they were definitely floppy.
Nah, I’d end up explaining why floppy discs weren’t floppy, instead, and let the younger folks explain the CDs.
They were floppy though?
At least 8 inch, and 5.25 inch. 3.5 only on the inside (unless enough force is applied xD).
By 3.5" you ofc mean:
/s
The larger ones were flexible, not floppy—they could be bent without cracking the casing, but wouldn’t just bend under their own weight.
If you held them by a side and shaked them, they were definitely floppy.