David Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 8 months agoAI coders think they’re 20% faster — but they’re actually 19% slowerpivot-to-ai.comexternal-linkmessage-square100linkfedilinkarrow-up1393arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
arrow-up1393arrow-down1external-linkAI coders think they’re 20% faster — but they’re actually 19% slowerpivot-to-ai.comDavid Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square100linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·8 months agoThe hypothetical is literally underskilled newbies replacing oldhats.
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·8 months agothe astute reader may note a certain part of my comment addressed a particular aspect of this
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·8 months agoand yet you’re still wrong. Interesting how popularity isn’t correlated with correctness.
minus-squarezbyte64@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoYou’re the one bringing up popularity in response to a substantial argument. I hope you’re okay…
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoand upon hearing the lesson, the journeyman went to the pub
The hypothetical is literally underskilled newbies replacing oldhats.
the astute reader may note a certain part of my comment addressed a particular aspect of this
and yet you’re still wrong. Interesting how popularity isn’t correlated with correctness.
You’re the one bringing up popularity in response to a substantial argument. I hope you’re okay…
and upon hearing the lesson, the journeyman went to the pub