

Someone give this person a congressional hearing and billions of dollars to burn


Someone give this person a congressional hearing and billions of dollars to burn


Cthulu is an archetype, right? Comes into our world with no regard other than what it can manipulate and drives people insane.
Edit: thinking about it, it’s not an archetype when it comes from an LLM. The consistency it does display doesn’t come from some conviction an entity should be a certain way. Ask an LLM to put an archetype in a novel situation and it falls back to matching forms.


I appreciate the emphasis on conviviality or human centric design. But boy I want to nitpick on the following:
when we collaborate with AI systems, we might be interfacing with the archetypal patterns that have guided human wisdom throughout history. This makes programming with AI a form of accessing collective spiritual wisdom rather than just advanced tooling.
I agree with the first half, that yes, you are engaging with archetypal patterns that is often present in human wisdom but that is where it stops. There is no guarantee the LLM has selected the appropriate pattern for your use case. There is no wisdom from the LLM because there is no conviction from its choices. The LLM, at best, is a superstitious machine that sees that X pattern worked in a situation with similar signifiers. Wisdom is understanding which signifiers are of consequence given your context, which requires being able to ignore/forget irrelevant context - something an LLM is terrible at doing as evident by all the “context engineering” tools that exist. It feels like a chicken and egg problem where in order for the LLM to “get right” what is the appropriate context it must first have the appropriate context.


“Oil unable to navigate Trump’s Strait”
“Ships lost trying to cross Trump’s Strait”
I think if I said this enough times I would likely say “Trump’s taint”, it kinda ryhmes


It would be Useful for doing a retrospective on whether AI is helpful or not


Epstein class wants to make sure the people doing the investigation are understanding…


Obviously our lawmakers are communist and this is a ploy to undermine the very capable and responsible software maker called Microsoft /s


If she said “Trump is cancelling Thanksgiving for many families because his war in Iran is driving up grocery costs” it would have been a slam dunk.


Yes this impacts everyone and everyone should be concerned. But the solution is in mass politics, not in “electing” another death cult leader. The conservative framework is fundamentally unable to address this issue.
Edit: after watching the video I would say the title reflects her audience.


That’s an ideal solution. The best solution is what works immediately and within your capabilities.


Heard a rumor that one of his advisor is married to an AI specialist at Google. Like I don’t expect Sanders to know who yud is unless someone on his staff told him it would be a good idea to talk to him.


Who is advising Sanders on AI?


Now what would a group of horny middle schoolers do to a bot like that?


I’ll do all that when the spec is written in stone.


Sure you can make the technology more resilient but if the enforcement is punitive enough then it won’t matter.


I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molly_Ringwald but nothing in the bio makes the reference make sense


Nodejs is not a framework though. So you very well could use the exact thing you linked to with many different frameworks


Those aren’t fileystem frameworks but filesystem interfaces used by frameworks. Counter example of what i mean: https://filesystem-spec.readthedocs.io/en/latest/


Good point. Now I imagine someone trying to pass the turing test by having their bot pretend to be a sales person.
Makes me wonder why we even bother with burying radioactive waste.