GitHub definitely would and has in the past. YouTube-dl is on GitHub and gets a pass because it is used by researchers and archivists, both are fair use. forgejo.org would let you be your own fedi-github and might be worth checking out (could be easier than designing a plugin system and additional repos).
Maybe, but it involves paying more for teachers.
In Satya Nadella’s Hit Refresh, he says that “growth mindset” is how he describes Microsoft’s emerging culture, and that “it’s about every individual, every one of us having that attitude — that mindset — of being able to overcome any constraint, stand up to any challenge, making it possible for us to grow and, thereby, for the company to grow.”
Strikes me as a poorly plagiarized Toyota Kata. Toyota Kata promises your org will be maximally adaptive but it sounds like Satya wanted to one-up that with “overcome any constraints”. Toyota emphasizes iterative improvements as way a to build up systems knowledge, but Satya seems to take an essentialist read on the matter to say it’s a “mindset”, like improvement is an ingredient instead of a process.
Raising Cane’s Chicken is so good 🤤
Yeah, translating “size of their contribution” to a dollar amount is going to be inherently political. If they’re leaving it open ended to let projects figure it out then that could go poorly…
It is like when racists say they’re race realists; it’s because the term “Soviet communism” isn’t that popular.
deleted by creator
I don’t see where Engels says Administration is “central planning”. It certainly seemed to have been an open question for Marx when he talks romantically of the Paris Communes.
You have a sales pitch that works for the poorest countries, what do you have for the wealthiest?
Frankly I find this view disregards the differing material conditions that are present. Social Democrats are left of what the Americas have now, just like Capitalism was to the left of having a Monarchy. Your take is a-historical, anti-materialist, and thus anti-marxist.
The funny thing is I thought you were talking about all the genocides, including those led by Russia, but then I saw your handle and realized you mean only those done by NATO and their allies.
Reading their solutions is interesting; wanted to call out the following because it plays nice if you don’t agree with their whole prescription:
Don’t dilute the Open Source brand. Post-Open will never call itself Open Source, because it has different rules. The Post Open license actually enforces that.
I swear they looked at Bill Gates failing to launch SMRs and thought: “he’s a smart guy”
20% asthma rate
Fuck
By aliens they mean incomprehensible, not extraterrestrial
no issues with bias were identified
Reminds me of when I did an experiment for high school science and could not think of anyways to improve the experiment because it gave me the results I desired.
I imagine the joy is similar to an addict learning they can cook their fix at home.
That’s OpenAI admitting that o1’s “chain of thought” is faked after the fact. The “chain of thought” does not show any internal processes of the LLM — o1 just returns something that looks a bit like a logical chain of reasoning.
I think it’s fake “reasoning” but I don’t know if (all of) OpenAI thinks that. They probably think hiding this data prevents cot training data from being extracted. I just don’t know how deep the stupid runs.
I worry this is going to leave a crater in the software industry that will take a decade to fill.
How can you miss with two guns?