• refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    About four years ago, Linus Torvalds rebuked him for spreading anti-vaxxer misinformation on the Linux Kernel Mailing List

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      tbf I’ll take Dale Gribble level conspiracy theories over Linus’ bad attitude any day.

      • bitcrafter@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, massive amounts of completely preventable suffering and death due to people no longer using vaccines thanks to the spreading of these conspiracy theories is totally not a big deal compared to someone having a bad attitude.

        • refalo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I said I will take it, not that I think everyone else should, or is capable of recognizing/ignoring conspiracy theories. I struggle much harder with ignoring bad attitudes than I do obvious bullshit, but to each their own.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        They actually do. To quote a major FOSS developer, “popularity is not a project goal.”

        Reminds me of early punk rockers that get upset when their tiny little nobody band that fits in their back pocket, gets too big to fit in their pocket anymore. Some might call it “selling out.”

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      At this point they should just switch to BSD. Although Wayland is getting traction there as well…

  • redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Hey, there is an entire wayland bad x11 good article hidden in the last 4/5ths of the article!

    Anyway, the article seems to argue that “toxic elements within Xorg projects, moles from BigTech, are boycotting any substantial work on Xorg”.
    It seems to me that now that wayland has become the clear focus of development, most devs sinply want X11 to remain as a legacy element, not causing unnecessary issues elsewhere, just remaining on lts.
    The train has sailed, wayland is the norm and everyone is working on implementing the last leftovers the article is parading in its weird latter half, rather than through much greater efforts achieving worse results in patching up X11.
    They should have forked X 10 years ago, when people were still interested in improving it.

    It being left behind is a logical and fully adequate explanation, arguing eee makes little sense when wayland is clearly a simpler protocol. If you wanted to harm linux or foss, and your plan was the transition to wayland and freezing of X11 development, I would call you stupid.

    I don’t see why this fork, and this article, have to get conspiritorial about something this easily explained.

    Now that we have the conspiracy crap addressed: wayland defense time

    The Reg FOSS desk is nearing 60, […] He doesn’t care about […] high and variable refresh rates, tear-free video,

    My fancy new monitor I got in '22 doesn’t work on X11. I’d have to replace my other monitors with matching new ones for a few grand, or keep watching videos and all else at 15fps, getting a headache. If you wanna keep your crt, why not keep an ancient X11, why this fork?
    X11 doesn’t support normal modern hardware, my monitor wasn’t even special, it’s just higher fps than my other monitors and 4k.

    Wayland does not currently allow controlling window position. This means that when you open KiCad, it cannot remember where you last placed your windows.

    The window pos remembering api (name made up by me, I forgot the real one) has been finalized, and will be in this or the next KDE version, etc… The wayland people are fixing the criticism faster than the critics can shorten their list of remaining issues.

    .

    uhhhh… ok that’s all the wayland criticism, 'cause surprise, the last 2/5ths of the article are actually a rant about … gnome? I think?
    Something about no more shortcut support or how removing title bars is bad and the gnome disk manager has bad ui.
    Idk my shortcuts are better than ever and my title bars were still there last time I checked.
    But maybe this “big no-accessibility” is why absolutely no tiling dwms have ever been seen for wayland ever. If you switch to wayland you will have to tile by mouse exclusively, you heard it here first!

      • redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        None ever, yes.
        Not sure what you mean to ask there, but I gotta say hyprland would make a sick name for a tiling dwm.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Hyprland and dwl are actual, existing tiling dwms for Wayland.

          i wonder what you thought “dwl” stood for lol

          • redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            could you hold this “s” for a while? I need the / it was leaning on for some webdev.

            According to AcronymFinder, the leading search result for “acronym finder”, dwl means “dying with laughter”. In combination with a questionmark it would form an exclamation of disbelief.

  • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    The author doesn’t appear to know the differenc between Wayland and the compositor. Or between X and the window manager. Neither Wayland nor X tile windows (which are called frames btw)

  • redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    one in which Weigelt announced the project’s Telegram group […] [which] has nearly 500 members and many thousands of threads.

    Mindboggling they think it’s acceptable to use a platform that limits access to those threads like they own them.

    Any modern open-source project has to develop on Discord and Google Docs™, that is well known. What were they thinking‽