Where’s all this hate against Wikipedia from? First off Wikipedia moved the article from “Allegations…” to "Gaza genocide back in May 2024, not just now. Secondly, moderators (assuming you mean administrators) do not have more say than others in content decisions. Thirdly, what you’re describing is referred to within WP as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV_dispute#POV_pushing, and I do not see any failings of the current procedure to address this.

religion

GitHub allows you to use a debit card, at least in the US. You might want to check again.

The article said it was done this way to rush the rule out before election day.

Service providers often rely on technicalities in agreements to make it harder to cancel subscriptions

He’s with my mother on the other side—Washington is watching from the other side! Teach me how to say goodbye

thefuck

game rentals have their place

yes

Every GitLab instance requires you to have an account there to comment and submit PRs. Projects are often hosted on different instances.

I don’t think digesting and water absorption are the same thing. Hydration is absorbing the water and digestion is processing what’s left besides the water.

RJM is chair of the Scientific Advisory Board for the European Hydration Institute. PW has received funding in the last 3 y from the European Hydration Institute for other hydration-related research. None of the other authors reported a conflict of interest related to the study.

Could not find much more information on this institute. It ran an introduction to a conference in a supplement to a trusted, peer-reviewed journal but supplements have a general reputation of being advertisements.

deleted by creator

article links to a yahoo version of 2019 CNN which links to a 2016 study with a URL resulting in a redirect to the new standalone website for the journal now-declared-independence instead of a DOI I had to rescue from the archives which now links to the ScienceDirect hosting of the article instead: https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.114769 (Thankfully open (archive) access)

In summary, the present study describes a novel tool to enable the objective assessment of the effectiveness of beverages to maintain hydration status. The BHI is reproducible and the pattern of response for a range of commonly consumed beverages is consistent with what is known about the effects of their constituents on water balance.

If it’s just an unchanging “no” and strongly in favor of not having the status quo go anywhere, I would indeed say that is “not leading anywhere”. Not changing what people think and how things were before is “not leading anywhere”.

This is said quoted post:

If you’re still buying wizard book shit, you are no friend to the trans community. Here’s the wizard book bigot inciting harassment against innocent people to her 14 million followers on the nazi app.

And no, they can’t Always Tell.

Concrete proposals made for UK public enforcement of washroom trans ban. Lgbtq visitors to UK please be aware and all trans people travel in pairs, avoid any known conflict sites and do not take direct action but withdraw and call police if harassed in washrooms.

From twitter/X

https://bsky.app/profile/shelleybwoke.bsky.social/post/3ls7m4vhsy22z

I get why you would think said post was Rowling’s, though . It’s quite confusing how the article laid it out and it’s easy to miss that the embed logo changed from \mathbb X to Bluesky.

could you change the post title to be article headline? i’d hate for this post to be removed for breaking rule 3

This post’s article is not English either.

I think so, if the headline is preserved while machine-translated.