• peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m sorry, but didn’t Google pioneer the image recognition models years ago that Inaturalist uses to help users identify plants and animals? Google can suck it, but perhaps ai has proven it has a place in these applications?

    • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Pattern recognition and “generative” ai are 2 completely different things. One is helpful tool with limited capabilities , the other is an overhyped markov chain that uses humongous amounts of energy and steals humans’ creative works.

      • peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It is my understanding that the advances in classifier models were and are inexorably linked to generative models. Wasn’t Deepdream a fairly crude inversion of existing classifier models?

        • aio@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          You’re totally misunderstanding the context of that statement. The problem of classifying an image as a certain animal is related to the problem of generating a synthetic picture of a certain animal. But classifying an image of as a certain animal is totally unrelated to generating a natural-language description of “information about how to distinguish different species”. Moreover, we know empirically that these LLM-generated descriptions are highly unreliable.

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 hours ago

        this is the one we banned a few days ago coming in from another server

        and even if it isn’t hoo boy that posting record