I’m not one of those people, and to be clear I support for-profit companies open sourcing code. Mozilla is a unique case where donations are a tiny fraction of their income and Firefox development is a tiny fraction of their expenses. I just want to donate directly to the parts I care about (Firefox, MDN).

Open source projects shouldn’t have “making money” on their priority list. I would donate to Mozilla if I had some guarantee that my money would actually fund Firefox development

I clicked that link and the first dozen results were Reddit posts and garbage

Exactly. Agile is basically guaranteed to deliver something.

The real question is how fit-for-purpose is the resulting product.

The dark mode on this site… Hardest I’ve laughed in a while. A+ trolling

Edit: only works on desktop by the looks

Something like retool but open source?

That’s an even number

Even in python, writing code at the top level is not recommended for any non-trivial project. I mean, you might as well say “kotlin is closer to python because they both end with N”. Neither method of comparison offers any value to OP.

That’s a weird way to compare them…

There’s always a trade-off. In rust’s case, it’s slow compile times and comparatively slower prototyping. I still make games in rust, but pretending there’s no trade-off involved is wishful thinking

We must do different sorts of programming…

USB flash drive

I like Go too, but not because it’s a good language. I like it because it’s the simplest garbage language I have to use regularly, and that puts a cap on how bad it can be. It also got a lot of language-adjacent things right, like tooling.

When OP inevitably has issues, I guess we’ll have to blame it on the boogie

Scrolling through the live streams, 90% is piracy and the rest is automated AI/nature/whatever streaming. Didn’t see a single “twitch style” human steam.

Is owncast going to struggle with adoption more than other fediverse projects due to the inherent synchronicity of content creation and consumption?

Quite the opposite. If you fast forward merge without squashing, you lose the ability to meaningfully bisect, since only the head of each merge is checked by CI - other commits may not even build

I think this is strictly less than 100% true. There is significant value in using tools you know and like

More like a promise that never rejects

Pretty sure the only time I’ve heard someone say hominem is Eminem in the fast section of Rap God

Hiring is literally condensing candidates down to a boolean