• 1 Post
  • 27 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 24th, 2023

help-circle







  • Because people might want to have a look at a platform before considering moving to it, and they would consider it because they wouldn’t be afraid of missing out on their usual content.

    I’m confused about the difference between a lurker and someone requiring an account, yet don’t want to interact with the community. Why can’t people who leave a platform and create a new identity “lurk”/browse the old place for content, no matter if leaving reddit or lemmy?

    I’m not so sure, there are more spectrums and gradations than clear-cut groups.

    You’re right in the way that it’s subjective - your perspective is as valid as mine. My own preferences still stand, I don’t want to interact with current reddit regulars.



  • I don’t see the point replying to you any more, you seemingly overlook the points I’m trying to make in a sort of “the goal justifies the means” argumentation. But others might find it interesting.

    No identity is being “stolen”. The mirrors are not doing anything on behalf of the users, and no content is being altered.

    It’s copying content belonging to a different entity without permission and presents them on a third party site without enough clarification to be distinguishable from the original account (many have expressed confusion at replying to “mirrored”/ghost accounts). It’s not a content viewer like teddit etc. It’s copying the content and presenting it for itself.

    I hope people understand how it can be argued for it being a stolen identity, even if one personally doesn’t agree with it.

    Go to /r/redditalternatives and let me know how many people simply don’t understand the concept of instances. Or understand the concept of instances, but didn’t want to bother with the process of finding out which one to choose. Or went with the “just go to lemmy.world” approach, got burned because it was struggling to deal with the influx of people and thought “Aw, Lemmy sucks”. Or took the time to find an instance, but after signing up had no idea how to find (re-)discover all their niche communities.

    Sure these are issues, but I still don’t think it’s ethical to present “claim your account now!” to users. It comes across as borderline extortionate to me. I don’t think it’s ethical to apply “peer pressure” by having regular users clamor for people to claim their accounts.


  • It’s a lot of work to interact with the databases at this level, for most enthusiast and self-hosting admins it would simply be better to limit the damage by cutting off the infected appendage and wait for proper cleaning tools to come to lemmy admin.

    It’s usually been images that hogged the resources, but that’s been due to the “steady” user base on Lemmy in the thousands or tens of thousands. Suddenly injecting… hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of accounts? We’re in uncharted waters now.

    I’m helping out at my home instance and talked to the admin - We’ve defederated as well.






  • I agree that people should treat each other with respect. For those who doesn’t understand, this is a good post. Perhaps I can elaborate on “the other side”, or at least my side, and people could perhaps understand why people disagree with the mirroring?

    As most of you probably know, the network effect prevents most of the users of an existing platform to switch to another one. “Why would I go there where there will be no one, when all the people I want to interact with are here?”

    I don’t want to interact with people who need a crowd. I want to interact with those who want to discuss my favorite topics. There’s a healthy lack of shitpost and joke comments on Lemmy outside of the shitposting and joke communities. I like that. I want that to continue. I think it’s due to the lemmy crowd being different from the reddit crowd.

    It was the case for Mastodon until Twitter started to really become mediocre

    Yes, the good ol’ days as I remember them. Filled with anti-censorship and freedom loving people willing to put their principles of a free internet above having a sheepish crowd of followers. Now I don’t use Mastodon that often.

    We might be in a “next year is the year of the Linux Desktop”

    Try looking at it from the perspective of people like me who have been using Linux for years or decades - Who cares about “the year of the Linux desktop”?

    admins complaining about the system resources consumed by alien.top instances, “as much as the largest instances”. Does that mean that if tomorrow reddit.old dies, we double or triple the number of users on Lemmy, instances would have to be shutdown?

    Yes, or take “drastic” measures like blocking whole instances or migrating data to external storage. My previous home instance got overloaded due to lack of proper admin tools and literally had to shut down due to a lack of storage space during the reddit influx.

    but should we be worried that Lemmy will hit a scalability ceiling at some point?

    Cries of help, “I’m out of space”, from admins of smaller instances comes up in various support communites every so often. It’s not a scalability issue if you have the funds to just increase resources. So yes and no IMO.


  • From a lurker point of view, it doesn’t change that much, though.

    Then why not lurk at reddit for reddit content if it’s not about interacting with the community?

    If in the near future the communication would be both ways, what would you think of the tool?

    It would be a nightmare, there’s a clear difference between the people that have joined Lemmy because they wanted, those who joined Lemmy because Reddit became shit and those still on Reddit. I don’t want to interact with those still on reddit, if I did I’d simply stay on reddit.