They basically want free labor.
They basically want free labor.
Lol. Git itself can act as a server over the git protocol. Might have been easier 🤪
There’s plenty of git forges that aren’t GitHub. Git itself has nothing to do with central servers and can theoretically be used in a completely decentralized manner.
I use a Misskey fork for micro blogging and I can’t even get Lemmy posts to load. The profiles of communities do, but that’s it.
Ah right. What I really meant to ask was if it can do protocols other than http.
Which I don’t think it can…
Are you able to tunnel ports other than 80 and 443 through Cloudflare?
Definitely a good way to do it. Photoprism supports uploading to WebDAV for sharing. Could front a CDN upload with a web dav server 🤔
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. I am using photoprism for photo management. It doesn’t really support S3 or any CDN. You could use a fuse filesystem or something, but it’s very slow.
Where are you uploading galleries? Just your own HDD connected to a static website?
The fork was originally created because upstream NewPipe elected not to include sponsor block functionality.
Will existing projects have to adapt their codebases to work with ActivityPods? I assume yes.
So is there a way to follow someone on Threads now? Or at least get one’s instance to load a post? Where are the details of this beyond Zuckerberg’s post?
Tasks.org syncs with various services. Those services may or may not have a web UI. I use it with Nextcloud tasks, which has a serviceable web UI.
If you download it from Fdroid, it doesn’t have a subscription. And it has all the features unlocked.
Am I missing something? Or is the link to this tool not actually present in the post? I only see a screenshot.
Not necessarily. While of course in many many cases, open source is a volunteer effort, there’s usually some implicit transaction going on. Whether that’s improving the software for yourself and passing that on to others, being a business and improving a library or something you use that helps your project generate revenue, or even a straight up commercial transaction.
But in all these cases, the open source project can be taken by you (or others) and you can do whatever you want with it. In the case of Winamp here, you cannot do any of that. It would be different if they were paying for contributions. But they’re not, so.