Why are you reading this? Go do something worthwhile.

  • 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2023

help-circle

  • pachrist@lemmy.worldtoProton @lemmy.worldProton CEO goes full MAGA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am a little confused by this because I think they’re kind of technically right?

    Democrat corporate interest will absolutely keep them from going after big tech. Maybe they think and ponder about some antitrust stuff, to save face, but it comes to nothing. Any significant change we’ve had recently has come from legislation in the EU.

    Republicans are absolutely more likely to go after big tech than Democrats. But it’s not because they’re altruistic or down to help the scrappy little guy. They’re petty. They hold grudges. They’re still mad tech companies clamped down on them over Covid. But, they haven’t been bribed yet, but once they are, this goes away.

    That’s why all these contributions are coming into the inauguration fund. There’s more to come.

    But that only works on the Republicans who haven’t drunk the Koolaid, and there are more and more Republican politicians who drink as much Koolaid as they possibly can. They’re not the classic grifters taking advantage of their constituents, they’re diehard believers, and that’s way scarier. They’re the most likely to retaliate against big tech.

    I guess the “Trump supports the little guy,” take is bad, but the “Republicans are more likely to hurt big tech,” is not. Never underestimate pettiness.






  • Think of it more like Netflix. Netflix was great, then the market fractured and Netflix enshitified in response.

    What it would take here is for a publisher to become a real distributor in the space, but competition is weak right now. Just like it really took Disney wading in to disrupt Netflix, it would take someone equally large, like Microsoft, to disrupt Steam. Sorry Ubisoft, but you don’t cut it.


  • No, because the market has become so fragmented, no streaming services are profitable, so there's no show on one that will ever last. Average shows last on TV channels because of ads. A medium performing TV show can last forever on TV with ads. A medium performing TV show on a streaming service gets canceled after a couple seasons to transition resources to a new show. They're looking for that next big flashy thing to draw subscriptions.

    In the current broken system, the only options are to continually churn shows, or push ads on streaming services. Both are happening.

    So, if you pirate a TV show today, you aren't killing it, and you aren't part of the problem. Paying for the service won't keep the show around, and not paying for it won't kill it either. The show is already dead, you're just not forking over your hard earned cash for a bite at its dead corpse.



  • I disagree.

    If the story is true, Tim coaches the new hires and on boards them into the environment. Tim serves as a sound board for the senior techs, since he’s privy to the larger departmental scope. He is the point of contact for the team.

    The manager telling the story needs to be fired. Tim is doing his job.

    The manager here only serves to add a layer between Tim and management that is ultimately unnecessary, as the story proves.

    Fire the manager. Promote Tim.