El Barto

I mean, if you lose the game, you lose the game. You don’t say “hey you made me lose the game! Don’t do that!” Because that’s not how the game works. If you “make” someone lose the game, tough luck.

By the way, you lost game again :)

Oh shit!!

Was this an elaborate way to make me lose the game? Ass!

Any specific examples?

I’d be interested in this too.

Why didn’t the pilots stop the engine when they saw him?

If you own an electric fan, then you know that “turning it off” doesn’t mean that its blades are going to stop immediately.

Now, imagine an airplane engine that is capable of moving a “bus full of people.”

Yes, I know engines aren’t electric fans, but you now have an idea that “just turn it off” wasn’t going to cut it.

Oh hehe! Thanks for explaining.

What’s a load zone simulator?

HA!!!

No but here. And.

At this point, I know there are so, so, so, so, SO many good games out there from 1977 onwards that I can just play whenever, that I lost interest in checking out new games. Maybe for the graphics, but unless there’s a quantum leap in gaming (like, Matrix-like immersion without the dying), then I’m not interested.

And I don’t exaggerate when I say 1977. Have you played Atari 2600’s Phoenix? Shit is addictive!

Plus all the hundreds of thousands of homebrews.

So you share the sense of pride and accomplishment!

Come to think of it, starting with this post, it has already begun.

Great success!

Maybe something’s happening with the net.

What you describe may be undesirable behaviors, but that’s not immaturity.

Lack of critical thinking, stubbornness, indoctrination, ignorance, whatever you want to call it. Not immaturity.

Because you don’t call grownups immature. It’s dumb.

Man. I really wanted to support you, but you’re making it very difficult.

You’re offended by an accusation of being right-wing instead of listening to what they (the person) haslve to say. In turn, you just linked gay people to pedophiles - perhaps unintentionally, but damn, man. That’s actually bigot talk. Now, I’m not saying you are. But again, take a step back and reflect in how you approach these themes. Otherwise you’ll be making more harm than good.

You lost me at “immaturity” here.

All good points. Just a minor thing, but when you say “you fight, you’re more likely to lose,” I’m not sure if this is true, because for a team to lose, another team has to win. So you could very well aay “you fight, you’re more likely to win.”

Now, you could make a case of a team that could easily and overwhelmingly beat the second team, and if they fight, they’re more likely to lose players, and thereby, they’re more likely to lose. Because if they fight, the other team could lose players, so if they fight… they would win anyway, so the likelihood of winning doesn’t increase.