El Barto

Lol!

For other readers: Einstein expanded Newton’s findings. Classical vs quantum physics.

Lol!

I understand. Thanks!

Newtonian gravity and Aristotlean gravity have of course been entirely debunked

Can’t speak for the Aristotle part, but yup… that sentence is just bullshit. Don’t say stuff like this in public, man. It’s embarrassing.

Ok, I’m done with this topic.

Have a good weekend.

I fundamentally disagree with all you said. You’re essentially saying that we must believe in subjectivities, which is a core principle of all religions even if they don’t say so.

By remaining truly objective, I have preserved my capability to be free and to help those surrounding me.

Yours is just some other metaphysical philosophy, and the “soul” in soulism, a concept I don’t believe in at all, should have tipped me off.

Good luck with everything. Have a nice weekend.

I want you to open your mind to the impossible and question everything.

I can certainly do that.

I don’t really care whether you see gravity as inescapable

Well, this is not helping.

But sorry, absolutely no one can escape gravity. It’s everywhere in the universe. Can you escape Earth’s gravity? Sure. Good luck escaping the solar system’s gravity, or the galaxy’s gravity, or the local cluster’s gravity. So that’s my point. The Wright Brothers “example” is a non-starter.

Everything else you mentioned are not “natural laws.” They are human/social constructs, which you pointed out and we can agree on.

But I thought soulism went beyond that. It’s okay. Today I learned something new. Thanks.

heh. Indeed. What a shitshow, my friend. Politicians suck so much.

I guess we don’t disagree, then.

You technically answered my question, but that verges in strawman territory, man. I was talking about the absurdity of considering gravity a form of human oppression. Can you tell me why I shouldn’t see it as absurd, given that it’s a natural, inescapable law?

Yes. Gravity does not ask one’s consent before pulling.

Lol you lost me here.

What about oxygen? We’re enslaved by it. We can’t escape it. What are you guys doing about it?

Some moderation is important today. I agree with your idealism, but let’s face it. Any unmoderated space would sooner rather than later be run to the ground by a swarm of AI bots, psyop agents, spammers and trolls.

Long gone are the days of pristine, unguarded forums.

Oh I agree with you, friend. The problem is that they’ll say that they’re losing ad revenue. So they’ll try and sue, even if they’re in the wrong.

I disagree. I don’t like AI slop. But he’s using AI here in a way that is very much intended. I want to share something in Mandarin, I don’t know Mandarin. If only there was a way to transform my thoughts into Mandarin…

Anyone doing this will be banned in that platform.

Where would it be hosted so that Conde Nast lawyers can’t touch it?

Well, that was disappointing. We don’t need more of that noise. I don’t know what’s worse now. Because Maduro has created a lot of suffering. But Machado is part of the old school polotics that also created suffering (hence the raise of Chávez).

Thanks for the sources.

Can you show me some sources, please? I’m genuinely curious and I’m willing to learn.

Um. Nah. I don’t agree with you. I will give you that she is an opportunistic politician.

But this “neo whatever zionist”, nah. She’s part of the old school Venezuelan political system that was in place prior to Chávez/Maduro. Whether that’s good or bad, I’ll leave to others to decide.

But does she want peace and freedom for Venezuela? Has she done more and sacrificed more than you or me combined to make that happen? Absolutely.

Kinda of two-faced of you to criticize her for receiving the nobel prize given your comment history.

Why not?

You’re*