That’s fair. I started with what everyone was using at the time, which just so happened to be Neovim. I’m also too lazy to switch/try anything else.

Plus, I’m not sure if Neovim simply extends Vim functionality. I know it’s a fork, but the codebase has changed so much I’m pretty sure many newer features of Vim need to be manually added to Neovim. Inlay hints in the middle of lines is already implemented in Vim: as for Neovim, it’s not here yet (well, it’s coming in 0.10, but I don’t use nightly so I don’t have it)

I mean, I’d just bind vim to nvim. If you still want vim accessible, bind it to something else. I don’t really see any downsides to Neovim: it’s decently backwards compatible, enough to use most old plugins, with the advantages of Lua config and a much wider repository of plugins.

Thank you for that information. I had no idea that command existed, I guess because primarily I’ve seen people sending patches over email. I’ve updated my original comment with additional information. Thanks for calling me out 😅

I mean, Git doesn’t natively have pull requests either…the “official” method involves sending patches through email. It seems that Fossil has a similar setup (although without the tool)..

PRs are a feature introduced by GitHub. I guess Fossil bundles would be close enough to them.

EDIT: I was wrong. Turns out Git does have a pull request feature. It requires you to upload your code to a public repository, after which it generates a message asking to pull, which can then be sent via any medium to the repository owner. It doesn’t require patches, or GitHub. Differences to note: these aren’t like GitHub/Gitlab/Gitea pull requests, where you’re given a simple web interface and have to merge from a repository on that instance. Your repository can be hosted anywhere using git request-pull. You’ll most likely then send the request through email, and get feedback in the form of replies. If you push newer changes to that branch, you’ll have to request another pull, as request-pull only specifies a commit range. But yeah, I guess got technically does have pull requests. (For the scope of OP’s question however, I don’t believe he meant this.)

Same for rebase.

Oh that’s smart! And then nushell just handles the data for you…I might try that!

Looks very cool! I’m very comfortable on Voyager, but I checked it out and my initial impressions:

• Comments take up a LOT of space
• IMO, comment replies should be shown by default (but obviously should also be in a setting)
• The Lemmy devs would prefer if you didn’t show account points.
• IDK if I’d show the name/community of the user above the title
• Showing the title instead of community at the top when viewing comments would be cool
• Maybe rename “Explore” to “Search” (or at least make it more obvious how to find search)
• Maybe add a Markdown toolbar?
• Reloading posts every time you exit a post makes it feel a bit slow

No app’s perfect from the start, just my two cents. (Maybe I’m getting a little nit-picky? IDK, just my advice.)

From the README:

Feel free to take a look around. We are not yet taking patches as we still have a little bit of tidying up to do. When we do, there will be a contributor license agreement.

So yeah, looks like there will be a CLA.

This is fucking cool. I can imagine the many times this could’ve helped me quite a bit, and honestly even if I didn’t find the function I needed I could still probably hack out a decent implementation in whatever language and actually contribute towards this. In 5-10 years, this could be really useful.

My code is beautiful.

My process wasn’t.

I already regret it, but I won’t stop.

I’m going to try it in Haskell.

Might Probably will regret this.

Recursive Mono. It’s freaking cool. I like ligatures so it’s got them, it’s nice on the eyes, and it’s playful without being too playful.

Bonus points if you use Semicasual.

IIRC, should be Cascadia Code.

Also, I’m the opposite. I love ligatures, I feel they make my code cleaner and remove extra noise.

Truly! One day I decided to take the plunge and learn functional programming with Haskell—I haven’t been the same since.

Functional languages aren’t for everyone.

I dabbled in Haskell, and my time with it was very enjoyable. I grew comfortable with the syntax over time, so I’d say try the language for a few days/weeks (really depends how fast you learn) and see how it makes you feel.

I definitely suggest trying out Haskell. I followed the Wikibooks guide, and ever since using Haskell, I haven’t been coding the same. Functional programming can be amazing.

I’ve never heard of Unision. A quick look at it and it seems interesting, but very foreign. I’ll try it out and give it my thoughts.

I blocked most news communities. Stuff slips through, but I don’t really have the mental capacity to care about it.

Use an app? I use Voyager and it’s a really smooth experience, and I haven’t re-logged in since I first got it.

Yeah, I mention that later in the comment. Of course, there’s the whole suite of Jetbrains editors.

I think both of these are just editors written in Rust.

Well, it is standard.

That’s probably the biggest thing to consider: you use Rust, you use Cargo. It’s unanimous.

It’s built right into the language ecosystem, so there’s no divide, and everything’s just easily available to you.