LOL they haven’t “forgotten”, they just don’t care.

that still doesnt allow sending emoji reactions.

Either way, it doesn’t matter. The point is, RCS does not matter. It is not necessary.

Replaced with AI and video walls.

I’m not sure what you mean. Every receiver has a sender. If you send it to someone with Google Messages without RCS, they will receive it.

It doesn’t, actually. Google Messages implemented this before Apple got RCS. It’s as simple as seeing a message come in that says " liked message" and converting it into a 👍 response for the referenced message. Unfortunately no one has followed their lead on that one.

This is a Mac app and not web-based

Because they gained their monopoly by, yes, being first, but also by continuously being the best. And they don’t exploit their monopoly. They don’t do anything that could be construed as anti-competitive, despite certainly having every opportunity. They’re an intermediary between publishers and consumers, and generally speaking they are good stewards of that intermediary, generally operating in favor of the consumer, rather than the big game publishers.

DISAPPOINTED

😮‍💨

Is it possible to transfer RAID drives from a Synology server to an Ubuntu server without losing the data?

…they aren’t public.

The reasons are literally in the image you provided.

Regardless, even if they did, that’s certainly not exclusive to the fedi.

I don’t think you can claim there’s a “lack of privacy” when things that are intended to be public…are made public.

I mean “its back” in the sense that demand is rising for nostalgic purposes. Not in the sense that anyone wants a new one.

What lack of privacy are you referring to?

I think one critique of the fediverse is the lack of privacy

What? By whom? How?

E: why am I being downvoted for asking a question?

That’s pretty cool but they’re also going to be subjecting themselves to a very high level of scrutiny.

They all suck and should be avoided.

You entered a thread explicitly about E2E encryption started by ShortN0te

That person replied to a thread I started, not the other way around. It was never about E2E. It was always about encrypted backups.

It could have a encrypted backup feature but it won’t change it’s fundamental purpose

It’s not supposed to. It shouldn’t.

They’re meant to be workable in other tools like QGIS, Strava or Komoot. Encrypting them would break that entirely.

Then make it optional? Or don’t, I don’t care.

deleted by creator