Makes me wonder what the difference between a super used set of tires and a 30% used set of tires would be, though.
Just chilling
Makes me wonder what the difference between a super used set of tires and a 30% used set of tires would be, though.
If it makes the people paying taxes feel happy then I don’t see why not.
The real primary benefit of storing your relationships in a separate place is that it becomes a point of entry for scans or alterations instead of scanning all entries of one of the larger entity types. For example, “how many users have favorited movie X” is a query on one smaller table (and likely much better optimized on modern processor architectures) vs across all favorites of all users. And “movie x2 is deleted so let’s remove all references to it” is again a single table to alter.
Another benefit regardless of language is normalization. You can keep your entities distinct, and can operate on only one of either. This matters a lot more the more relationships you have between instances of both entities. You could get away with your json array containing IDs of movies rather than storing the joins separately, but that still loses for efficiency when compared to a third relationship table.
The biggest win for design is normalization. Store entities separately and updates or scans will require significantly less rewriting. And there are degrees of it, each with benefits and trade-offs.
The other related advantage is being able to update data about a given B once, instead of everywhere it occurs as a child in A.
Wait you’re telling me it’s not because they have a Kubernetes product?
That’s fair too. I just figured Lawrence wouldn’t care as much about the team without Lance driving.
I’d rather a new team TBH. But yes, also sell the team.
I’m not saying it doesn’t suck for this person, but product market fit is a thing for open source too. If people need it they’ll use it and contribute until something better comes along. If not, your idea wasn’t the one. That doesn’t mean it’s not possible. Nearly my whole life runs on open source software, so it’s pretty clearly sustainable.
over the years, using “open source” has become an excuse to avoid paying for software
Um. Yes. And to be blunt: obviously. And in return, I give away software I create for free whether people need it or not, and try to give back in the form of contributions too. But I’ve never once given up my day job for it. Would that be nice? Maybe. But open source software is more frequently sustained by passionate people using and expanding it for their own projects and not by expecting people to pay you for your efforts when you’re likely not paying (nodejs, github, ahem) for the software you’re building it on anyway.
I ordered them through Lowes and they had all sorts of options for connectivity and power, including just old school chains. Looks like they’re Bali brand.
Haven’t watched the video yet, but I’m a huge fan of our plug-in z-wave smart blinds. Makes getting all that extra light way easier and automatable.
Wow, spoilers!
Jk the whole season is gonna be like this. 🫠
Piracy is just staying over at a friend’s house.
Sometimes it’s not about GDPR and more about “we get no benefits from this area because we have no presence there but we get plenty of DDOS.” Source: had to do this at my $DAYJOB.
How very apt that Hollywood would be so skilled at projection.
They turned Clippy into a game?
Hey there! Looks like you’re trying to release some dopamine!
And so many other things. I’ve also used it for “cloud saves” back/forth from my desktop to my steam deck on games that don’t support them for various reasons. Dyson Sphere Program being one, because the files can get quite large.
I’ve learned lessons about assuming something that seems obvious.
Please tell me suyu is a deliberate play on “sue you.”
Don’t forget his son! They can watch together in VR even when they’re apart.
I was a huge fan of his until the Bottas wreck where he lost his temper and smacked Bottas’ helmet.