Tacos.

Data was artificial and autonomous. The Dr originally wasn’t autonomous, it could be argued he’s just part of the ship, but the holo emitter changed that. I’m amazed the Daystrom institute let him keep it, but since it’s apparently his, and that makes him autonomous, I would argue he’s just like Data (minus the permanent corporeality of course). I suppose there’s a question about ownership given his origins as a Starfleet asset, but since he can be replaced with a copy of the original program, there’s no real material loss in letting him leave the ship.

When one must measure their money by its physical volume, me thinks that’s too much money.

Eh, it’s probably good enough for this. Go for it.

Timezones are literally enums for UTC+offset. lambdas maybe.

I ain’t no valley scientist.

It’s the creepy valley of sweeteners. It tastes like wrong sugar.

Data’s the science officer. He could probably build a phaser from scrap blindfolded. Him saying maybe “something” happened during transport is clearly a deflection. I bet he thought about this moment when he discovered Lore and all Lore had done.

“simple r dropper” seems like a double entendre.

Meh, I knew what wizardbeard meant.

turtle svn

that’s a name I’ve not heard in a long, long time.

If you’ve ever driven from east Texas through El Paso, it definitely feels this big.

https://www.duluthtrading.com/men/collections/ballroom-jeans/

completely depends on the rental agreement. I encourage anyone reading this to find all the loopholes and exploit the ever living shit out of them.

If I paid for Hertz’s $7 a day insurance and it says I’m not liable for damages in any way, then fuck yes I expect to be able to drive into a brick wall and walk away. Landlords who are too stupid, lazy, or uninformed to protect their capital from the people they’re exploiting to grow it don’t get special treatment, their capital is fair game. It wouldn’t be my fault if Hertz sold me that coverage, and it wouldn’t be a renter’s fault if a lease agreement let them off the hook for flushing a barbie down the toilet.

What’s the last time you scrubbed the floor at a McDonald’s out of the kindness of your heart, just because some pee splashed on it?

If you don’t own it, it shouldn’t be your responsibility to repair it. The only circumstance in which you should spend money beyond the rent you already pay to fix something that doesn’t belong to you is if you broke it and your rental agreement doesn’t cover accidents. Homes require maintenance, lived in or not, and a homeowner can decide to neglect that at their own peril. If something goes wrong, it’s the landlord’s responsibility to fix it, not the person paying them for the service of having a roof. If they don’t they’ll likely lose a tenant and therefore income, so fixing their investment property is just required investment maintenance, the cost of doing business as a landlord.

I’m well aware many places have laws that touch on this subject, many of which have been heavily influenced by landlords.

shadowsocks seems to be the best way for now.

new record incoming, removed from the service before even being added.

Holy wars are fun, but this is the answer.

At least this way the holy war takes place in commits to change the formatting file.

Unless go, in which case the holy war is now everyone who hates go format rewriting the code in a different language.

That is because they are superior.

spatium vult.