Terror bombings don’t work full stop. Even the nuking of Japan didn’t result in the populace giving up, and there’s ample evidence to suggest that it was at the very least the combined threat of the Russians shifting focus to the eastern theatre as well as the nukes that caused Japanese high command to conclude that their current losses would be infeasible to sustain. And even that wasn’t without internal controversy and disagreement.
I can see absolutely no way this could not go wrong.
Honestly, in a properly designed WiFi6 or 7 network with sufficient ap density the average user experience will likely be better than most end station wired connections these days. Especially if that wired network includes a bunch of these bad boys.
This is a very cheap network switch that serves as a great example of shadow IT happening in most companies. Because they were cheap and just about any computer store had them in stock, it was generally faster for an employee who had ran out of network ports to run out and grab one of these than to request proper network upgrades from the IT department. Sadly, because they are not very fast and lack features needed to prevent network disruption due to misconfigured wiring, they cause lots and lots of headaches for the IT team over time.
A good starting point to learn about physical networking would probably still be to grab a recent set of Cisco CCNA prep books and give those a read.
The old adage “There is nothing more permanent than a temporary solution” still applies.
If the business relies on the availability of the thing that’s receiving a temporary fix, you can be your ass someone, somewhere, is declining the downtime to fix it properly once it’s up and running.
Minimum 250 cc, alright. Doc didn’t specify what proof that was supposed to be…
Yeah, you’re right. I was looking at the fin layout, but forgot to check the mounting system.
Your pixels to text capabilities are clearly superior to mine. I stand corrected.
I am 90% sure this is an Intel system judging by the cooler.
Sounds like an interesting read, got a link to said post?
I think that the nukes did certainly affect Hirohito’s willingness to accept a surrender, together with the Soviet attack on Manchuria. There is little evidence to suggest though that it was the population’s sudden lack of support for the war effort or an attempted revolution that forced Hirohito’s hand. As such I don’t think we can even consider the nuclear bombings to have had much effect on the population, which is generally the point of terror bombings - to break the population’s resolve and force them to depose of their leadership.