I don’t really understand why you’d do this, either you want a retro experience or not? There’s millions of ways to get a better visual experience so why would you modify classic hardware?

It’s really hard writing software and knowing every bit of it then seeing it as a new user to write docs.

I’ve recently gone back to using reddit regularly because it’s the only place with sensible news, lemmy is such a bubble it’s a terrible place to get opinions and ideas from.

Latchkey kids of the 21century have it worse than the originals, parents not there for them but now they’re also helicopter parents spying on them and controlling their actions remotely. I guess we should call them drone parents.

I bet you’d get upset if someone pruned your trashy videogsme collection.

Is it really so hard just to let people enjoy what they enjoy without being a dick about it?

That’s what the commentor thinks too, he imagines all the good people who want a fair and sane world will cheer him on and the nasty criminals to slink off Into the night mubling how they’d have got away with it if it weren’t for that nobel hero saving the day for the good capitalist folk and their billionaire corporations.

This is a great app, really good way of getting your steps in snd finding new places

But surely you see how you can’t say ‘kids might see it so it’s banned but we can have this worse stuff because kids won’t be able to see it’

Adult streams with nudity and violence use the same system so should be treated the same.

And for clarity I’m not saying that they shouldn’t decide what their platform focuses on but if people are going to use the think of the children argument you don’t get to split it to allow violence without question but forbid nudity, it’s not consistent. Support banning both or neither with this argument or make a different argument is all I’m saying.

The first paragraph of this is brilliant projection.

You’ve also made up a lot of weird lies and confusion simply to get around the fact that your assertion that only governments can do censorship is wrong and all this to defend a totally meaningless point because my argument is still 100% as valid if we use a more cumbersome word or phrase instead of censorship.

Seriously read your own comment history and work on your issues.

Oh and anyone interested in how deceptive he’s being in this rant, his statement about me being into conspiracies is from a post talking about knowledge fight and the absurdity of conspiracy theories. This is not someone that even understands the concept of arguing in good faith.

I used Wikipedia and the dictionary as a source for the established usage of a word, a totally reasonable usage of the resources.

Yes in another thread entirely I made an observation that a joke is misogynistic and got upvoted by people who agree. I also made a joke that people saying ai learning from images it viewed is theft from artists would be angry at the statement made in post that piracy is not they because the original owner doesn’t get deprived of the original - none of this had anything to do with the topic at hand.

Your effort to dismiss my options with (incorrect) semantics and now whatever this weird display is make it very clear you’re simply against the conclusion I come to but are incapable of coming up with am actual argument against them, very typical emotional response tbh but digging into my comment history is a bit of an obsessive act and hints to me that you’re not seeking truth especially as you refuse to spend less effort reading the first paragraph of a Wikipedia article and learning your already meaningless argument on word definition is wrong.

But again pro censorship person tries to use methods to silence someone or divert from their original point rather than address the actual argument is par for the course.

So you’ve totally changed your tone, why would you have commented what you did instead of saying ‘valid opion, I’m sure they’ll choose to do whatever they want based on public sentiment so you expressing your opion is a totally normal and acceptable thing to do’?

You seem to want only people who agree with you to express their opinion, I’m not shocked of course that’s how censorship lovers slways think.

I’m very clearly talking about banning them on twitch, you really need to follow along. I never mentioned governments once.

You think it’s OK for twitch to show gta6 to children as long as they don’t go in the strip club? A lot of people would argue that murder, drug dealing, theft, and all the other crime and immorality is actually worse. You might end up with a platform that only allows Nintendo’s most family-friendly shit.

Yeah that is the law, it has nothing to do with anything I said. I am very aware the first amendment doesn’t apply to private companies and it certainly doesn’t here because my country doesn’t even have a constitution let alone amendments to it.

I was talking about people asking a private company for more censorship - if you read the Wikipedia article you’ll see in the first paragraph it explains your misconception that censorship is only something governments can do. Private companies can and do do it, I think it’s silly when people ask twitch to increase censorship because you’ll all be crying when people can’t stream gta6 because society got so slap happy on the censorship that murder, drug taking and crime got caught up in your crusade against seeing the human body.

• and I did provide a source, Wikipedia. I trust you’re not incapable of finding the wiki page on censorship are you?

No you’re confused, go read the Wikipedia article or a dictionary, you’re making the same mistake as the other guy trying to shoe horn in the ‘1stA only applies to government’ talking point where it doesn’t fit

You’re confused, you muddled your taking points - the 1st amendment applies to the us governments but the word censorship has no relation to that

Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or “inconvenient”.[2][3][4] Censorship can be conducted by governments,[5] private institutions,[6] and other controlling bodies.

So no I’m not talking about the first ammendment at all I’m talking about whiney babies crying that twitch doesn’t censor things they don’t like and if the topic is twitch banning content then I’m entirely accurate in doing so

Please try to focus and think through what you’re saying in future

It’s hilarious to me when people argue for more censorship, especially when they do the ‘everyone should be treated like children’ argument. It’s just so dumb especially as it’s coming from people who’ll cry if they ban violent video games or any of the other equally problematic things that they like.

Omg a woman is wearing a bikini, it’ll melt children’s brains if they see that! They should only be watching murder and crime and delusion political takes from manipulative liars and idiots…

There shouldn’t be kids as a lot of the games aren’t suitable such as gta, etc

If they must have kids on the site they should be restricted to only viewing suitable content.

The rest of us shouldn’t have to be restricted to kids stuff

AntiAI bros raging at this

Personally I believe that yes open source should be created by governments for the global good, that open source should be created by people studying PhDs and that community commons projects should be part of schooling with students learning how to use and contribute to them.

However the main brunt of open source should be created by people who simply want it to exist because we will always outnumber and outperform government workers and students.

Personally I would love to see a world where contributing to community projects is something everyone does as part of their life, not only because it’ll create more open source but because I think it’ll be a much healthier community if we stop seeing everyone else around us as competition and start seeing them as fellow workers in the project to improve life for all.

Yeah it’s open source, 3rd party tools existing is kinda the point really. If these people care so much then they should be working on making tools to address the issue, or funding someone to do so.