Honestly get a third party HE controller and call it a day…

I’m not sure.

If I was him I suppose I would want to get revenge by getting to be their boss and firing them or training them until they change their behavior.

I think the solution is pretty straightforward you have to get rid of the racist/corrupt cops it’s not like a stern word will change people like Williams (the cop that kept on getting fired and reinstated).

So I dont think he is forgiving anybody here. He is on a mission to eliminate the issue from the top. And when it comes to mafia like structures like in Boston the only person that can effectively deconstruct that is at the very top of the hierarchy.

At least that’s what I’m hoping for. Also I thought the person that elected him is known to be fighting against police brutality and racism.

Forgiving or trying to fix a corruption problem from the top?

I have signed the petition but wasn’t ever asked for an ID.

So in countries like mine (FR) how are they gonna check my signature?

What you can probably do is create an encrypted archive and selecting the checkbox that hides filenames. It’s what I usually do in that type of case.

It should prevent gmail from knowing what is in the archive.

I still remember tasting that in a restaurant many years ago.

Extremely simple to do and with good tomatoes this is absolutely delicious.

I also like pico de gallo on some crumbling and hot bread.

I’m not sure why people are trying convince me to change my mind on something.

I have seen it in my logs with my own eyes. I wish I could be left alone without having to bother looking into it.

Whatever the reason is. Someone is crawling through dictionaries of address. It is slow but steady. It started with abuse@ and other generic addresses and then started trying names. I blocked the sending SMTP server once I realized what was going-on.

What am I suppose to do? Ignore it and just triage in inbox?

This is not at all my experience with custom mail domains.

And I say that after spending a lot of time setting SPF, DKIM and DMARC filtering.

I guess you got lucky.

Does it?

Do you think spammer will just stop at the first address and then call it a day?

In my experience there is no such thing as a “catch all” domain address. The second your domain leaks then many spammer will just go into a frenzy and try hundreds or thousands of mail aliases.

Especially since they can’t really spam Gmail as easily (since early 2024) they will even more aggressively spam any other domain.

I’m a bit skeptical on the Email alias feature but this is a really cool project.

I just don’t know how practical it is to use custom domains to receive those confirmation emails.

Wouldn’t you receive a ton of spam once your email domain leaks (which will eventually happen)?

Email is also useful for password reset.

Ah I get it.

Anyway low consumption kind of mandates that kind of flash build IMO.

Isn’t there any way you could stagger buying those SSD? Like you buy them one by one only on sales or refurbished hardware.

You could also maybe attempt a raid5 only with only 3 disks until you could buy a fourth one?

Anyway good luck!

I’m sorry if this is not relevant but I don’t have the time to read that whole of text:

https://youtu.be/l30sADfDiM8

I think this is at least similar to what you want to achieve.

My strategy with paywalls is to close the tab and go somewhere else. It works fine and is a great way to let the website owner this bullshit make them lose viewers and visibility.

the commercials that have already been paid to the company are still showing, so that ad revenue is still being capitalized.

That’s not how it works though. You are not accounted for watching the ads over a pirate stream…

Also people regularly spend more than they can afford.

When you think about it the fact that you can quite easily borrow money you clearly will not reimburse which is kind of an infinite money Glitch for capitalism.

Thanks ! That’s exactly how I think it could be implemented but that confirms that this is certainly not something you can find commonly where I live.

That confirms the fact that if you use the same wifi and everyone has entered the same encryption key then there is no real client isolation…

It’s cool that wifi keeps evolving. It comes a long way from the WEP beginnings.

Do you have any documentation on how this work ? Is there a name to this special protocol? Is it a recent addition to the wifi standard ?

Again a wifi AP doesn’t send data to a specific client. So how does an AP can enforce that one client can’t read a frame for someone else that is properly authenticated? How would an AP prevent someone spoofing mac addresses from receiving that data ?

I’m really confused by this feature I never heard of even when I was playing with aircrack and so on. Yes sometimes your mac address can get filtered but even that is not really difficult to avoid.

Sorry I have so many questions but I honestly did quite some “tinkering” with wifi years ago and none of this sounds familiar.

I have no idea what this client separation is.

As far as I know there isn’t really any client separation on wifi. It’s a shared medium.

At least I don’t see anything preventing you from reading someone else traffic. So anything unencrypted on a wifi is also accessible to any other clients.

I had tools more than 10 years ago that could automatically hijack session cookies on wifi for anybody connected and not using https.

Edit: I know, I shouldn’t give a shit. But writing a fairly long comment to share my knowledge on this only to see it immediately downvoted without any explanation kind of sucks. So I’m removing this comment and will not interact here anymore.

* in 360p.