On this end, you responded to an upstream post - federation does weird things to comment threading.
As for the meme: I posted it. I’m Gus. You just accidentally complimented my methodology and insulted yourself. Do you need me to type more s-l-o-w-l-y?
I understand. It’s a deeply weird thread.
We’re on Lemmy, boss. We should probably be working instead of shitposting on communist Reddit
Bold of you to call me a clown from inside the circus. Also, I didn’t post the meme.
Beratna, you’re agreeing with me. Did you reply to the right comment?
Kowlting da forata, beratna.
PS: Im pensa na Claude fo da.
If it quacks like a duck etc etc.
I mean…if the meatbags can’t get it right, what chance do the poor clankers have.
Wah wah wah. Still no argument, tho.
Play the game not the man, champ.
TTFN!
Have…have we considered that 1) Rust is shitty 2) LLMs learned to code from shitty Rust coders?
Proud? Nah. Bemused, sure.
You hit Wikipedia and looked up utilitarianism. Cool.
Utilitarianism requires weighing all affected parties, not just the ones harmed. AI-assisted diagnosis in underserved regions. Accessibility tools for people who can’t afford specialists. Climate modelling. Translation breaking language barriers. Medical research leading to a Nobel Prize in Medicine.
“Can’t name a single good thing” isn’t a utilitarian argument. It’s vibes. And it’s prima facie untrue. There’s not much point in citing counter-examples because you’ve already made your mind up. Cf. your post history on Fuck AI.
The warfare point is a military policy conversation, not a ChatGPT one.
The art and skill atrophy concerns are legit. But that’s a “how do we manage this” conversation, not “therefore unethical.”
Note by the way I haven’t personally attacked you or accused you of having Claude’s arm up YOUR ass? That’s called an ad-hominem - look that up in your next wikipedia search.
Swing and a miss.
Checking post history to see who I’m talking to is called due diligence, champ. You have sadder shit in your profile that I did you the courtesy of not quoting because it’s not relevant to the topic at hand.
No substantive counter, straight to ad hominem, huh? If I’m a bot, I’m the horniest bot on the fediverse. Anthropic is going to be so disappointed in me!
Eh, I bet that fuck would have been unsatisfying, pappi. You’d leave a girl high and dry. And the pillow talk after would be scintillating, I’m sure.
PS: your mother uses a bot 🤖
You do when you’re talking shit like it’s solid gold. Ethics isn’t “I don’t like it, therefore bad”. Bro made the claim…he gets to back his shit up. Or he gets to look like 20 something shouting into the void with penchant for shitty memes.
No hate for OP. But news flash - 99% of all code is AI assisted now. Has been for about 5 years. Sowwy.
You can fuck me if you want, but bring dinner first.
Also, you may want to look into why Amazon is shredding the books, hoss. They’re destroying them because of copyright law. A judge ruled the scanning is only fair use if the original is destroyed.
https://betanews.com/article/amazon-airtag-book-scanning-ai-training/
U got big feelings. We can cuddle after we fuck if you want.
Remember how everyone became an expert epidemiologist and virologist in 2020?
That’s what a lot of the anti-ai noise is. Same Karen energy.
Big feelings, shaky foundations, some real points hidden behind performative tribalism. IOW, another Tuesday on the internet in 202x.
“it’s unethical”
Uh huh. Which framework? Kantian? Virtue ethics? Rawlsian justice? Utilitarianism? Pick a card, any card.
Lay it out, big man. Nail that shit to the door like Martin Luther.
PS: “I don’t like it” != “it’s unethical”
Upvote for “prompstitutes”
Stay mad, bro. Claude living in your head rent free.
“Curious to know what others think!”
High treason, I’m afraid. You’ll swing for that.
Do you? Pressing X to doubt, champ. Pressing X to doubt.
Quick - to wikipedia!