Love the “Arms: 2”

It’s essentially a first-party IP now, so you’re just as likely to see the next Mario game on PC as you are to see a Xenoblade Chronicles game on PC.

While that’s true, it was mostly just because Mondale was from Minnesota, and even then he only won by 0.18%.

Anyone still living in Florida at this point thinks they’ve still got decades before things get really bad. These people think they’re the “smart” ones getting ahead of the curve and selling before the prices drop. I hope they’re wrong, but honestly, there are probably a decent amount of wealthy idiots that believe climate change is a hoax and are looking to grab some nice beachside property while the “suckers” are leaving.

Growing up my family only had one pair of scissors, and they had a big, bulky plastic handle that was curved specifically for right-hand use. It was the most uncomfortable thing to use, and my parents refused to buy a second set of scissors when the one we had was “perfectly usable.” Please, buy your lefty kid some scissors that don’t dig into their skin when they try to force their fingers into the handles backwards.

I imagine most people just don’t really know which style they’d prefer until they’ve already gotten used to the default right-handed method and don’t feel like starting over. Non-standard play also makes it harder to find an instrument, and learn chord finger positions and online tabs, as others have mentioned.

I’m mostly only left handed because I’m missing several fingers on my right hand. As a result, I play right-handed since I can still hold a pick with only 2 fingers. I feel like fingering is better suited to the dominant hand anyway, though I suppose certain styles of play still require a lot of dexterity from the picking hand as well.

As I mentioned, I have a wife who I live with and spend time with every day. We met online, and only later realized that we went to the same school, but were in different grades. We probably saw each other on multiple occasions, but we were just strangers then. I also have plenty of local friends who I spend time with as well. However, I live in completely different states from some of my oldest friends from school. We voice chat online every week, and meet up in person every few years.

I have a couple groups of people who I play video games and tabletop games with online who I’ve never even seen in real life, and wouldn’t even recognize walking down the street, but we’ve known each other for years and have real, meaningful connections. Two of the friends from one group even realized they live near one another, and have since begun dating, making plans to move in together soon.

And yes, I am a part of several online communities in forums, sites like Lemmy, and elsewhere that I keep up with. We have nice conversations and heated arguments. We help each other with problems and questions. We’re simply a group that any member knows they can turn to when they need to connect with someone.

Life is complicated, and there are an insane amount of different ways to connect with people. Amazingly, some of those are through the internet. The idea that some connections are real and the others are fake is complete bullshit, and you’re clearly making a bad argument in bad faith to let off some steam.

You can literally see that it’s a jpeg. Whatever, man. At this point you’re just trolling. But hey, that’s one of those human interactions that the internet made possible, so thanks for highlighting that for me.

Sorry, bud; you’ve been having a human connection this whole time.

Haha, we’re in a digital age, buddy. Computers are nothing more than the latest way to connect real people in real ways. Sure, bots exist, just like spam telephone callers exist and were probably major issues when that was the main way for people to connect with one another across large distances, but you’re not going to stop it by covering your ears and denying the existence of every person you can’t physically see.

I have a wife and family, I have friends, and I have online communities I care about; they’re all just different legitimate social circles. We may not have evolved for it, but we’re living it anyway, and the faster you adapt to that, the better.

… I can’t tell if you’re serious or not, but if you’re honestly so put-off by human connection and comradery, I’m disappointed. Kind of a weird take from someone on Lemmy if that’s the case, though.

In the context of people who hack their systems? I’d certainly say so.

Don’t fight for yourself, fight for the community.

It doesn’t matter what I want, it matters what the community as a whole wants, and we want more than just pirating. Nobody’s hiding, we’re just not missing the forest for the trees; it’s not honesty in discussion to boil and entire group of people down to the desires of just the few people in this thread, it’s just being self-centered.

If you want to talk about what you as an individual want, feel free, but don’t act like it’s the definitive thing to discuss when the community is greater than all of us.

The majority of people pirate, but insofar as there is a single person who wants to do literally anything else with their hacked system, then it isn’t exclusively about pirating, and the narrative to condemn the entire practice of hacking as being solely about pirating is nothing more than another corporation trying to make it harder for people to modify their own property as they see fit.

If it comes down to it, I’ll split the cost with you. If we can’t get socialized medicine the way it’s meant to be, we’ll make it ourselves!

I was really surprised they decided to use Kalos for the next Legends game. I was sure it’d be Johto. I’m not sure what to think about it; Legends Arceus felt like The Pokemon Company was finally realizing that wild pokemon should be… wild. This new game looks like it’s much more modern, though - how can they capture that same feeling of expedition and exploration in a developed landscape?

Edit: Apparently it’s set entirely within Lumiose City. I’m pretty convinced now that it’s going to have nothing in common with the previous Legends game, which is a real shame. All that game needed was a bit more attention - that a sequel would’ve allowed for - and it would have been the best representation of pokemon ever.

There’s a reason all the kids in the late-90’s ran around their respective playgrounds pretending that ferocious wild pokemon were attacking them; that’s what everyone imagined future games would be like. But that was back when the games were only held back by the gameboy hardware, rather than The Pokemon Company’s current unwillingness to give games the developmental resources they need.

I’m really looking forward to it. The only reason I don’t enjoy souls games is because I hate their gloomy emo setting, so this looks right up my alley.

So it’s… forbidden to modify it into something that kills even more people. There’s a reason I didn’t use the word “illegal.”

It’s a statement comparing 2 objects that are forbidden to modify. Guns are forbidden due to their ability to kill even more people through modification, video game systems are forbidden due to their ability to hurt company profits through piracy.

People are pointing out the huge moral difference between the bases for those two similar rules, and how one cannot compare them fairly as being equivalent unless they also believe those bases are equivalent.