- 0 Posts
- 74 Comments
FiskFisk33@startrek.websiteto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•We don't talk about IPv519·13 days agofun fact, the RFC introducing NAT calls it a “short-term solution”
FiskFisk33@startrek.websiteto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Man eats dubious street food—ends up blowing apart his GI tract - Ars TechnicaEnglish2·2 months agoIt is a thing of beauty!
wait, does windows jit compile C++ ??
FiskFisk33@startrek.websiteto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•I'm gonna refactor later.181·3 months agobut it removed half the point…?
i know this is a joke, but i find it quite interesting those two words have completely different etymologies.
Grave as in burial site comes from an old proto indo european word for “dig”, while grave as in serious comes from french.
I mean, sure, you won’t stay alive for very long with a stopped heart.
I meant like, when someones heart stops and gets restarted again with cpr or a defibrillator or something. People often call that being dead, and coming back.
people say quitting smoking is hard. I don’t understand, I do it multiple times a day.
I know this is a definition in many places. I find it stupid and useless.
The heart beating is not a good definition of being alive in my opinion. The heart stopping temporarily doesn’t mean you died, you were just in terribly grave danger.
If a person is defined by their heart, what does that make a heart transplant?
utterly useless definition.
the point is cans aren’t that hard to open. you wouldn’t get two skeletons and a bunch of unopened cans relistically.
FiskFisk33@startrek.websiteto Technology@beehaw.org•Apple's USB-C transition is a confusing mess (and that might be on purpose)9·3 months agosure, wirelessly.
FiskFisk33@startrek.websiteto Technology@beehaw.org•Bitcoin mining is no longer profitable7·4 months agoit would, but the act of giving a dollar doesn’t double as a way to validate transactions
FiskFisk33@startrek.websiteto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Chances for the fediverse? Elon Musk takes hit as Europeans ditch X in drovesEnglish2·4 months agoI still see it too, interestingly
FiskFisk33@startrek.websiteto Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•*Permanently Deleted*English21·5 months agodo you mean github or do you actually mean git?
md5 for example is already vulnerable. People have figured out how to manipulate data into having a pre-specified hash. Meaning someone could engineer deliberate hash collisions and serve you any file they like.
SHA-256 doesn’t (i think) have this issue, so far hah.
you have to fucking hope no one figures out how to backwards engineer the hashing algorithm you choose
“we towed it outside the environment”