I swear Nintendo tried to hide it because it was better than MK64
I swear Nintendo tried to hide it because it was better than MK64
Not sure if got the wrong vid, but that is definitely Angel of Death
They say it’d be too much of an undertaking, cost and time-wise.
The IGN article I just read also mentions FF6 (as an example) would take 20 years to remake, and I’m wondering how that would compare to FF8 if it was even on the table. (https://www.ign.com/articles/final-fantasy-8-director-would-change-the-combat-system-in-a-remake)
I think the one of the biggest reasons was FF7 just came first and helped to bridge common themes in the FF universe to a more novel (at the time) style of gameplay which included 3D graphics and a significantly larger story with a more expansive world.
IMO FF8 took a lot of what made FF7 critically acclaimed and fine-tuned it while giving a more modern and realistic story/world.
I see FF7/8 as a sort of renaissance to the FF universe; FF9 and beyond owing a bit of themselves to what 7/8 accomplished.
Here’s a pretty good video on it (recommend setting it to 1.25x speed)
KVM trays are generally only used for terminal/CLI access where widescreen doesn’t make much sense.
Widescreen ones are available (though not as plentiful) when the user is regularly using GUIs on it.
I don’t want an idiot martyr
Not friends of the gentle racing snails? How sad…
I thought AGPL only makes sure that a modification from the original must be released, and doesn’t cover new unmodified software that would connect to a server.
A company like meta could easily design their own product from scratch that would also have it’s own network and just a simple plugin that can communicate with the fediverse. Wouldn’t this could be a way for them to skirt around sec. 13 of the AGPL.
Honest discourse for the purpose of highlighting any possible issues and fortifying against the EEE process. (Prepare for war; hope for peace):
Let’s say they were able to join… (We should at the very least go over this possibility, as it can also help our admins decide.) How would we be able to protect our network?
Would making sure any features of one instance/app be open and able to be modified and/or gracefully integrated into another be an option? (similar to the GPL license) An example would be keeping a party from restricting access to a private network only through their app. (looking at you, gTalk and iMessage)
Any other suggestions?
Someone actually asked an almost identical question on StackEx a while ago. (things may have changed since) From what I got from skimming the answer, is there is precedence, and it should be covered within the TOS of the hosting website/network (i.e. lemmy.world)
The best method (including Soylent) is adding 2.5-4cm (1"1.5") of water to the shaker bottle, adding the powder, tapping the bottle on the counter a couple times, then topping off with water. Once filled, replace the top, give it a good shake, let it sit for a minute or two, and then give it a final shake to get the last bit off the side.
This method prevents the powder from sticking to the inside edge around the base or to the top and reduces the shaking needed. If you’re really hungry, with Soylent, you can actually use up to 105g (3.5 scoops) of powder in the standard sized shaker bottle and it will still mix properly if you finish adding water after replacing the top to a little below the flip-cap opening.