• 0 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2023

help-circle





  • I sure hope that’s not true. Cars already are a nightmare of inefficiency and should ultimately be reserved to some very specific usecases – giving access so flying pods to everyone is possibly the worst possible method of transportation ever thought of.

    Not only for the environment, as those would be mighty inefficient, but also for safety; people love clowning on Boeing but letting the auto industry make aircrafts will give us a lot more to be anxious about.

    Also, when a car fails, or a conductor has an emergency, in most cases the car just stops, we don’t end up with a ton of steel tumbling down at 200km/h on buildings, random people and other flying vehicles








  • Question 5 is incorrect, name@example is a fully valid email address, even after RFC 2822

    The spec of RFC 2822 defines an address (3.4.1) as:

    local-part "@" domain
    

    domain is defined (3.4.1) as:

    domain = dot-atom / domain-literal / obs-domain
    

    dot-atom is defined (3.2.4) as:

    dot-atom = [CFWS] dot-atom-text [CFWS]
    dot-atom-text = 1*atext *("." 1*atext)
    

    1*atext meaning at least 1 alphanumeric character, followed by *("." 1*atext) meaning at least 0 "." 1*atext


    If tomorrow, google decided to use its google top-level domain as an email domain, it would be perfectly valid, as could any other company owning top-level domains

    Google even owns a gmail TLD so I wouldn’t even be surprised if they decided to use it