

People misunderstand the issue with monopolies. Monopolies, by themselvs, are non-issues. It’s what they do in their position of monopoly that can be illegal, through anti-competitive behavior. Steam does none of that BS


People misunderstand the issue with monopolies. Monopolies, by themselvs, are non-issues. It’s what they do in their position of monopoly that can be illegal, through anti-competitive behavior. Steam does none of that BS


windows browsers are all niche when you introduce anything to the mobile market. An android / iOS ladybird browser would crush it


There is another rotor hidden behind the cabin, you can barely see it though the window


And also a huge QC culture. If we let the auto industry make aircrafts for the general public, we’ll soon wish we were flying Boeing


I sure hope that’s not true. Cars already are a nightmare of inefficiency and should ultimately be reserved to some very specific usecases – giving access so flying pods to everyone is possibly the worst possible method of transportation ever thought of.
Not only for the environment, as those would be mighty inefficient, but also for safety; people love clowning on Boeing but letting the auto industry make aircrafts will give us a lot more to be anxious about.
Also, when a car fails, or a conductor has an emergency, in most cases the car just stops, we don’t end up with a ton of steel tumbling down at 200km/h on buildings, random people and other flying vehicles


Let’s say we all magically become able to not crash into each other at all. That’s not going to make things much safer; car aren’t built with the strict QC of airplanes, they’re bound to have more failures.
When you have wheels, it’s not all that problematic, with some luck you could even be unscathed after losing a wheel on the highway.
Once you’re flying though? Anything happens and you’re pretty much toast


It will make up laws the minute you turn it on


TBH, ISP blocking is easily circumvented with DOH


What sucks about Anubis?


It does say it’s valid, but also that it’s obsolete, and while the RFC does define valid but obsolete specs, there is nothing defining domains without a dot as obsolete, and it is in fact defined in the regular spec, not the obsolete section


Question 5 is incorrect, name@example is a fully valid email address, even after RFC 2822
The spec of RFC 2822 defines an address (3.4.1) as:
local-part "@" domain
domain is defined (3.4.1) as:
domain = dot-atom / domain-literal / obs-domain
dot-atom is defined (3.2.4) as:
dot-atom = [CFWS] dot-atom-text [CFWS]
dot-atom-text = 1*atext *("." 1*atext)
1 meaning at least 1 alphanumeric character, followed by *("." 1*atext) meaning at least 0 "." 1*atext
If tomorrow, google decided to use its google top-level domain as an email domain, it would be perfectly valid, as could any other company owning top-level domains
Google even owns a gmail TLD so I wouldn’t even be surprised if they decided to use it
Oh nice, I can help :P
There is a fairly well hidden setting
You can go to Settings > revanced settings (top one) > player > flyout menu > hide audio track
It was greyed out for me, I had to first change Settings > revanced settings (top one) > miscellaneous > spoof video streams > default client > iOS TV


What are those?
“War is good actually” 🤮


You’re assuming that those 40% of Xbox gamers are also 40% of Xbox game pass subscribers


10m is not even a speck of the gaming landscape
Nutomic and Dessalines, and lemmy.ml
They literally have no choice, this was under threat of being essentially cut off any banking system. It’s fucked up, no questions about it, but it’s a societal problem that needs to be addressed legally, as any single company is powerless against that. Even Apple would not survive being banned by visa & MC