cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400327

In case anyone is wondering, it's rqd2.

The definition of paraphilia is "a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.", which can inclde pedophilia.

It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance

Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that.

You can see for yourself here

Update: A pull request was sent to remove the sus instance. It should no longer show up soon

  • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3113·
    1 year ago

    It's inclusive of both pedophiles and hebephiles - that is, prepubescent vs. pubescent children.

    So, it's got that going for it. Treating them both the same.

    Unfortunately, it's also used to obfuscate the fact that a MAP is a pedophile/hebephile. Which is bad.

    There are people who have messed up brains, who are attracted to kids, and hate themselves for it. They seek help (usually through lots of chemical treatments), and use the term MAP to separate themselves from the pedos. Unfortunately, pedos use the term MAP to hide the fact they're pedos, so… 🤷

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyzEnglish
          108·
          1 year ago

          Tell us you're not actually paying attention without telling us you're not actually paying attention

          There are people who have messed up brains, who are attracted to kids, and hate themselves for it. They seek help (usually through lots of chemical treatments), and use the term MAP to separate themselves from the pedos.

          This is a lie meant to make pedophiles come off as sympathetic. They're ALL terrible and there is no distinction between one pedo and another. If there's anything that horrific instance should have shown anyone, it's that. Any pedo who claims they hate themselves for it and are getting therapy are lying to you.

          Maybe actually read what's being said before blowing a gasket.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyzEnglish
              61·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I'm sure someone who won't put up with you trying to frame pedophiles in a positive light would be a monster in your eyes. Can't have anyone actually hold the pond scum you're protecting accountable in any meaningful way. How else would you fulfill your pathological need to feel needed?

              You keep living up to your namesake and you're going to find yourself in a gutter with a crack pipe and an empty bottle of Jim Beam, dude. Seriously.