• Olap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    3* is harsh imo. Just finished watching and it smashes Voyager’s time travel double. On par with IV. And is a solid character episode, leaning into kirk taking over. Acting wasn’t hammy, nothing to OTT, nice callback to new engineer (though missed a final nod/wink). Wasn’t proper mirror either

    4 easily

    • freamon@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Episodes 1&2 got 3*, but he’s given episode 3 only 2*, so he thinks the exact opposite of me. I didn’t like 1 (I would’ve preferred if the doctor and the nurse had found a non-violent solution), was bored by 2 (not a real Trekkie, obviously), and 3 was my favourite.

  • startrekexplained@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I discovered him as a teenager in the late 2000s, and was surprised to rediscover him recently that he’s still reviewing Star Trek, and other sci-fi shows like The Orville, etc. Love his reviews even if I don’t always agree.

    Also apparently he was invited to pitch stories to the Voyager writing crew, but they all sucked so they were not bought.

  • End0fLine@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I did not know this site existed. It looks like there is a huge following! I can add this to my list of sites to check out after the episodes come out.

    • Ensign Wyrm@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same! I was blown away by the number of reviews, and not just Star Trek!

      The other thing that blew me away was the number of comments on the article. I guess it makes sense as Trekkies are a dedicated bunch and his website has been around for a long time!