• Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’d hardly count something like a simple Solitaire clone app that could be otherwise played for free as a full game release… In terms of actual games, I’d much rather support mobile ports that can be bought for a one time price tag than those that are locked behind a subscription in perpetuity.

    • Gamma@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It sounds like they’ve got some plans, though I’m not sure there’s anything I’d actually be interested in:

      “And this is an area that we’ve been able to move in quickly in a particular space, which is interactive narrative games. These are easier to build. And we place those in a narrative hub that we call Netflix Stories.”

      “I think the idea of being able to take a show and give the superfan a place to be in between seasons and even beyond that, to be able to use the game platform to introduce new characters and new storylines or new plot twist events […] I’m really excited to see where this goes.”

      • Peter_Arbeitsloser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wish those things were separate subscriptions though. Now you are paying for Netflix being a movie/series streaming platform, a flmstudio, a game developer and publisher in one subscription. I just need a subscription for the first thing.

        • Gamma@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I hate it! Would be so much better if they funded regular devs to make regular games that are sold like normal