I don’t know whether it’s a popular opinion or not, but I think Dr. Pulaski was a great character and I found her much more interesting than Dr. Crusher. I don’t know if it was down to the writing or the performance but Pulaski is one of the best parts of season 2 and I would have been happy to see her character continue.

She wasn’t very nice to Data but that bit of friction between some of the main characters of the show was welcome, especially in the early seasons. And her performance in Unnatural Selection is a moment in the series my mind returns to often.

How about it? Do we like Dr. Pulaski? What’s her best moment on the show?

  • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m pretty ambivalent about her, but I agree it was an interesting performance, particularly for a woman at that time in television.

    She was horribly underused - it’s downright criminal that she doesn’t pay a significant role in “The Measure of a Man.”

    • Deebster@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      I watched that one last night and had the same thought - she’s been the face of nonacceptance towards Data and although Bruce Maddox is far more extreme in his views it seemed like a waste of her character building.

      That said, they’d already shoehorned in a Guinan scene so I don’t know where they’d find the time.

      • milkisklim@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Could you please expand on what you mean by shoehorning in the Guinan scene? How would you handle it if you were the episode writer?

        Edit: to be clear, I know what shoehorning is, I just want to know why you think it occured here.

        • Deebster@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          I was referring to this trivia:

          Picard’s scene with Guinan was not in the original script. Melinda M. Snodgrass was told that they needed a “Ten-Forward” scene to accommodate Whoopi Goldberg coming in that week.

          I took it as true, although I had a quick go at finding where this claim came from and am drawing a blank

    • SK@hub.utsukta.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Agreed, probably one of the mellowest character, cool, calm and composed.

    • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think obvious that she would have sided with Maddox and disagreed with the ruling. I don’t think her capable of overcoming her prejudices against artificial life forms.

        • xyguy@startrek.websiteOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think that’s something that gets forgotten. Season 2 gets skipped through a lot during rewatches I know. All anyone remembers is her being racist to data.

          She starts out mean to Data but she comes around by the end of the season. She is also a former lover of Kyle Riker, which could have made for a much more interesting dynamic for and with Riker if it had continued.

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 months ago

    Pulaski had interesting dynamics with almost every other character. I think she was written very well, especially for such a short tenure. Crusher was largely neglected by the writers.

    • xyguy@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree. And its a real shame. I also remember seeing Pulaski sitting in the chair next to Picard relatively often where I think of Crusher being in the medical bay far more. That could just be my own memory though.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I like her in so far as that she made Data even stronger by constantly challenging him. But she is also a stark contrast of the rest of the vibe on the show. Clearly they wanted a Bones analogue but it just didn’t work. I’ve also read a lot about how she operated on set and didn’t seem like everyone really got along with her, which kinda shows in the season.

  • Numberone@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    First TNG watch throughl, she was And impediment to s02 crusher. But as I’ve watched repeatedly, she was a great character who made her presence known. She wasn’t perfect, but she was interesting and she changed as the season went on wrt Data. I still think she was a eagerly underrated character.

  • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am somewhat neutral on her, when she was introduced I kind of felt she was a gender swapped bones to setup the bones / spock dynamic but with data.

    Sadly the only thing I remember her for is being mean to data, getting rapidly aged, and replacing Picard’s heart, that is 3 out of 22 episodes she is credited in.

    For me Crusher vs Pulaski somewhat comes down to bedside manner/ compassion. Pulaski just comes across as a bit blunt and prickly at times and Pulaski just has fewer memorable episodes due to only having the one season.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    I appreciate that she wasn’t as sexualized as Crusher (if at all), it was pretty cringey in the first season.

    • cybervseas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      True. But did you see Diana Muldaur’s appearance in TOS? She’s a classic beauty 👀

  • dayna@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I hated her the entire time she was on screen, amazing character, and very well written. In retrospect, disappointed she was removed from the show. It could’ve been interesting to see her either overcome her androids or not. As a definite outsider to the rest of the crew, I felt like it was a really interesting addition to the dynamics.

  • dm_me_your_feet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    She hated on Data, she can burn in hell. Beverly Kusher otoh is Bae, only bested by EMH who is best doctor.

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I know she’s getting a lot of love online recently, but I just don’t agree. She’s written as a dollar-store McCoy because the show didn’t know what the wanted and her acting is as stiff and blunt as it comes. Not only is Crusher a more interesting character, Gates is a much better actress.

    • xyguy@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      This video sums up my feelings exactly. Thanks for the recommendation. They are a lot more articulate than I was.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fantastic actress. She kicked ass as Rosalynd Sheas on L. A. Law among other great roles. Did a great job as Pulaski as well. I really wish Trek would give Pulaski a shout out on one of the other series currently in production.

  • Ildsaye [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Had a childhood crush on Dr. Crusher, but maturity has brought me a middle aged crush on Pulaski. Wish they’d had some guest appearances by her after season 2.