Originally submitted by Kekambas:

1 more flex spot in lineup.

  • Colbourn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m fine with no bench slots, I’m a hoarder so if you give me roster spots I’ll frantically fill them… but yeah most of those guys are pointless.

    I do think another flex slot will help make more players fantasy relevant.

    Right now roster depth is largely irrelevant, and without TEs we lose a whole class of players except for like 3 guys to find an advantage. I think this helps that.

  • Cfornace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d think any slots added should add a bench slot as well.

    • arcticfoxy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, let’s make the waiver wires twice as horrible! /s

    • shnizmuffinOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the waiver wire is already pretty brutal, I think the opposite might be a better call where bench slots are replaced by new slots.

      • Cfornace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t that kind of the point of dynasty? Waiver wire is not where you are supposed to be looking for players?

      • arcticfoxy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This makes sense to me from a team management perspective. With both Taxi and IR we’ve got plenty of spots to put unusable players. I might be able to be convinced on +1 bench OR roster slot, but definitely not both