Speaking at a Bloomberg event on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Altman said the silver lining is that more climate-friendly sources of energy, particularly nuclear fusion or cheaper solar power and storage, are the way forward for AI.

“There’s no way to get there without a breakthrough,” he said. “It motivates us to go invest more in fusion.”

Right, surely the energy intensive AIs will make the world invest in climate-friendly energy instead of just burning more fossil fuels as they always did.

Also shows how unsustainable the current neoliberal system is.

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.comEnglish
    19·
    11 months ago

    I’m not sure that I’m willing to care about what multi-billionaires think any longer.

    If someone becomes a billionaire they should be ritually sacrificed for the republic by the hands of children as we all drink the billionaire blood in the starlight.

    • sculd@beehaw.orgOP
      4·
      11 months ago

      Yes and no. We shouldn’t care about these people but we need to stop them from destroying our world (which they are doing).

      • shnizmuffinAEnglish
        4·
        11 months ago

        we need to stop them from destroying our world

        Yeah that’s what the ritual cannibalism is for.

  • tardigrada@beehaw.org
    13·
    11 months ago

    At least to some (large?) extent this is another red herring to distract from other and arguably more important AI topics such as copyright issues as well as legal and ethical issues imho.

  • megopie@beehaw.org
    11·
    11 months ago

    Huh, wasn’t this what they also said about why it was ok for bitcoin to be using as much power as Bulgaria?

    Honestly these hype bait things seem increasingly just excuses to build out more centralized computing capability.

    • explodicle@local106.comEnglish
      1·
      11 months ago

      The whole point of mining/staking/whatever is to be expensive. Governments can pigouvian tax it to high hell, mine workers can unionize, and it won’t make any difference to users whatsoever. So there’s literally no benefit to more energy use.

      Bitcoin mines can’t do general computing. They use ASICs that can only mine.

  • noxfriend@beehaw.org
    8·
    11 months ago

    The human brain can run on a hamburger once every day or two. Investing immense amounts of energy into statistical models is only taking us further away from true, meaningful AI, not closer.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    6·
    11 months ago

    I’m confident that we are not using compute resources optimally today, and I bet that the potential gains on the (immature) software AI side are a lot bigger than on the (mature) power generation side.

    • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
      3·
      11 months ago

      Fission isn’t fusion, and saying he “wishes” people would use more fission power isn’t actually doing anything to push for that. Fusion powering anything is still a literal fantasy for now, and in the meantime there is only going to be more fossil fuel use coming out of this. No one is currently building more fission plants for public grids, and he knows that perfectly well.

      • sculd@beehaw.orgOP
        2·
        11 months ago

        Absolutely. Just because Altman “wishes” a new energy breakthrough its not suddenly going to happen. And even if nuclear fusion succeed, applying them in real life in scale is another big problem…

        • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
          4·
          11 months ago

          And he wants it to succeed because he’s invested money into it and wants to make more money, not because he cares about the environment.