Note: These were collected by someone else and are what’s missing from the Epstein files. They were previously released.
In the files, you can see that there was a witness willing to testify, so I took out “unsubstantiated” in the headline:
-
YouTube video of Katie Johnson’s testimony: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRod
-
Full court docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/
-
PDF of the initial complaint (WARNING very graphic): https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/1/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/
Three memos that describe four interviews conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2019 contain explicit but unsubstantiated claims that Donald Trump sexually abused a woman when she was a minor in the early 1980s with the assistance of Jeffrey Epstein, according to a Guardian review of those documents.
The Department of Justice did not release those records when it uploaded millions of pages of files related to Epstein beginning in December. The existence of the missing documents was first reported by independent journalist Roger Sollenberger and subsequently confirmed by NPR, causing outrage in Washington and sparking an investigation from congressional Democrats.
The Guardian obtained the missing FBI form 302 reports, which memorialize 25 pages of agents’ notes from the four interviews conducted in the summer and fall of 2019. The notes describe how the woman came forward to tell agents she recognized Epstein from a photo sent by a childhood friend. Only the first session, in which she did not name Trump, made it into the public release. The Guardian has chosen not to publish the woman’s name.
“Claim”
Yeah no shit, people have claimed that for years. Provide proof, and then put the son of a bitch away. I’m so sick of more headlines about nothing fucking happening.
Yeah where’s all the victims that pulled out their phone while they were getting raped??!!! 20 years ago when smartphones were only an idea they could have just used theirs!!! /s
As far as I know a few victims have described genitals, as well as providing accurate descriptions of relatively unknown locations and associates. There is also a shit ton amount of proof that these victims were around Epstein and Trump during this time (pictures and communications). There probably is a lot more, but I’m merely making a point that proof in sexual abuse is very hard to find, and in most cases only possible right after the fact.
When a zillion different women come out with allegations against a man who will legally (and maybe illegally) destroy their lives for doing so, and the allegations keep coming? I know that’s not legal proof, but I feel like it should be.
Thousands of scientists from hundreds (if not thousands, I actually don’t know how many cultures there are) of cultures all around the globe agree in all their different languages that climate change is real.
People like my coworker — ‘Oil doesn’t cause climate change or environmental damage — those scientists just want to get paid.’
Do you understand what I’m trying to say? I can replace the words in the analogy to match the context of the conservation if you want.
Well they are right. Oil does not cause climate change or enviromeltal damage.
U look dumb
Yes yes, water isn’t wet it makes things wet